1 2013-06-27 00:02:14 Namworld has joined
2 2013-06-27 00:04:20 twmz has joined
3 2013-06-27 00:04:27 grau has joined
4 2013-06-27 00:04:57 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
5 2013-06-27 00:05:51 eeh has joined
6 2013-06-27 00:09:17 Skav has joined
7 2013-06-27 00:11:48 MobPhone has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
8 2013-06-27 00:11:55 Thepok has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
9 2013-06-27 00:14:57 eeh has quit (Quit: eeh)
10 2013-06-27 00:15:00 ericmuyser has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
11 2013-06-27 00:15:21 eeh has joined
12 2013-06-27 00:15:27 ericmuyser has joined
13 2013-06-27 00:15:44 catcow has joined
14 2013-06-27 00:15:48 ericmuyser has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
15 2013-06-27 00:16:12 ericmuyser has joined
16 2013-06-27 00:16:15 eeh has left ()
17 2013-06-27 00:16:31 thenonce has joined
18 2013-06-27 00:17:46 crank_ is now known as crank
19 2013-06-27 00:19:13 crank is now known as crank_
20 2013-06-27 00:19:26 thenonce has left ()
21 2013-06-27 00:19:30 MobPhone has joined
22 2013-06-27 00:19:33 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
23 2013-06-27 00:20:02 MobPhone has joined
24 2013-06-27 00:20:05 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
25 2013-06-27 00:20:47 crank_ is now known as crank
26 2013-06-27 00:21:03 eian has joined
27 2013-06-27 00:21:08 MobPhone has joined
28 2013-06-27 00:21:11 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
29 2013-06-27 00:21:12 crank is now known as crank_
30 2013-06-27 00:21:21 Skav has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
31 2013-06-27 00:21:36 crank_ is now known as crank
32 2013-06-27 00:22:14 MobPhone has joined
33 2013-06-27 00:22:17 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
34 2013-06-27 00:23:25 MobPhone has joined
35 2013-06-27 00:23:29 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
36 2013-06-27 00:24:53 MobPhone has joined
37 2013-06-27 00:24:57 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
38 2013-06-27 00:25:26 MobPhone has joined
39 2013-06-27 00:25:29 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
40 2013-06-27 00:26:00 MobPhone has joined
41 2013-06-27 00:26:02 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
42 2013-06-27 00:27:07 MobPhone has joined
43 2013-06-27 00:27:10 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
44 2013-06-27 00:28:10 dan__ has joined
45 2013-06-27 00:28:16 MobPhone has joined
46 2013-06-27 00:28:20 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
47 2013-06-27 00:29:30 MobPhone has joined
48 2013-06-27 00:29:34 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
49 2013-06-27 00:30:34 MobPhone has joined
50 2013-06-27 00:30:37 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
51 2013-06-27 00:30:37 shesek has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
52 2013-06-27 00:30:52 shesek has joined
53 2013-06-27 00:31:43 MobPhone has joined
54 2013-06-27 00:31:47 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
55 2013-06-27 00:31:55 miscrean1ty has joined
56 2013-06-27 00:31:57 dan_ has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
57 2013-06-27 00:33:57 btcven has joined
58 2013-06-27 00:33:57 btcven has quit (Changing host)
59 2013-06-27 00:33:57 btcven has joined
60 2013-06-27 00:34:15 miscreanity has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
61 2013-06-27 00:34:25 MobPhone has joined
62 2013-06-27 00:34:29 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
63 2013-06-27 00:35:13 MobPhone has joined
64 2013-06-27 00:35:16 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
65 2013-06-27 00:35:31 shesek has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
66 2013-06-27 00:35:48 Vinnie_win has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
67 2013-06-27 00:36:36 MobPhone has joined
68 2013-06-27 00:36:40 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
69 2013-06-27 00:39:19 MobPhone has joined
70 2013-06-27 00:39:22 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
71 2013-06-27 00:40:19 MobPhone has joined
72 2013-06-27 00:40:23 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
73 2013-06-27 00:41:14 egis has quit (Quit: Leaving)
74 2013-06-27 00:41:25 MobPhone has joined
75 2013-06-27 00:41:29 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
76 2013-06-27 00:42:25 macboz_ has joined
77 2013-06-27 00:43:44 MobPhone has joined
78 2013-06-27 00:43:47 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
79 2013-06-27 00:44:58 Ferroh_ has quit (Read error: No route to host)
80 2013-06-27 00:45:19 MobPhone has joined
81 2013-06-27 00:45:21 Ferroh_ has joined
82 2013-06-27 00:45:22 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
83 2013-06-27 00:46:23 shesek has joined
84 2013-06-27 00:46:29 MobPhone has joined
85 2013-06-27 00:46:32 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
86 2013-06-27 00:47:18 intx has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
87 2013-06-27 00:47:41 MobPhone has joined
88 2013-06-27 00:47:44 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
89 2013-06-27 00:48:15 Nesetalis has joined
90 2013-06-27 00:49:30 MobPhone has joined
91 2013-06-27 00:49:33 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
92 2013-06-27 00:49:56 twmz has quit (Quit: leaving)
93 2013-06-27 00:50:10 twmz has joined
94 2013-06-27 00:50:35 MobPhone has joined
95 2013-06-27 00:50:38 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
96 2013-06-27 00:51:22 twmz has quit (Client Quit)
97 2013-06-27 00:51:31 twmz has joined
98 2013-06-27 00:51:35 MobPhone has joined
99 2013-06-27 00:51:39 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
100 2013-06-27 00:52:16 intx has joined
101 2013-06-27 00:52:27 MobPhone has joined
102 2013-06-27 00:52:31 MobPhone has quit (Excess Flood)
103 2013-06-27 00:54:58 wamatt has quit (Quit: wamatt)
104 2013-06-27 00:55:36 wamatt has joined
105 2013-06-27 00:55:48 wamatt has quit (Client Quit)
106 2013-06-27 00:56:17 wamatt has joined
107 2013-06-27 00:59:03 roconnor has joined
108 2013-06-27 00:59:53 bbbrian has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
109 2013-06-27 01:01:11 free499__ has joined
110 2013-06-27 01:01:21 wallet43 has joined
111 2013-06-27 01:03:17 testnode9_ has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
112 2013-06-27 01:07:02 anarchy5 has joined
113 2013-06-27 01:07:18 reneg has joined
114 2013-06-27 01:07:42 reneg is now known as Guest27090
115 2013-06-27 01:10:21 Guest1778 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
116 2013-06-27 01:10:43 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
117 2013-06-27 01:14:56 owowo has quit (Quit: sayonara)
118 2013-06-27 01:17:10 Nesetalis has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
119 2013-06-27 01:18:23 Vinnie_win has joined
120 2013-06-27 01:23:38 a_meteorite has joined
121 2013-06-27 01:23:39 seeingidog__ has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
122 2013-06-27 01:23:44 a_meteorite has quit (Changing host)
123 2013-06-27 01:23:44 a_meteorite has joined
124 2013-06-27 01:28:24 MobiusL has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
125 2013-06-27 01:29:21 MobiusL has joined
126 2013-06-27 01:29:57 msvb-lab has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
127 2013-06-27 01:32:26 reneg_ has joined
128 2013-06-27 01:34:49 nomailing has quit (Quit: nomailing)
129 2013-06-27 01:35:52 Guest27090 has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
130 2013-06-27 01:40:34 dan__ is now known as dan_
131 2013-06-27 01:48:02 btcven has quit (Quit: Saliendo)
132 2013-06-27 01:48:10 msvb-lab has joined
133 2013-06-27 01:48:35 Nesetalis has joined
134 2013-06-27 01:51:05 <imd23> hi
135 2013-06-27 01:52:02 <imd23> can someone explain me the script part of the transactions?
136 2013-06-27 01:52:57 <phantomcircuit> imd23, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script
137 2013-06-27 01:53:09 <phantomcircuit> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transactions
138 2013-06-27 01:53:09 molecular has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
139 2013-06-27 01:54:35 A2501 has joined
140 2013-06-27 01:54:47 impulse has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
141 2013-06-27 01:55:05 <A2501> any programer here that uses ruby?
142 2013-06-27 01:55:31 <gwillen> A2501: oddly enough, yes, why?
143 2013-06-27 01:56:45 impulse has joined
144 2013-06-27 01:56:50 Vinnie_win has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
145 2013-06-27 01:57:18 <A2501> I need someone to finish a work some idiot did not finish
146 2013-06-27 01:57:22 <A2501> sorry my language
147 2013-06-27 01:57:40 <gwillen> ah sorry, I'm not doing contract work
148 2013-06-27 01:57:42 <gwillen> but good luck :-)
149 2013-06-27 01:57:55 <A2501> well, is ready
150 2013-06-27 01:58:02 <A2501> just need few things
151 2013-06-27 01:58:11 ahbritto_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
152 2013-06-27 01:58:29 Vinnie_win has joined
153 2013-06-27 01:58:31 <imd23> phantomcircuit: Thanks, I tried to read that but my head is a mess, i need some lower level explanation.
154 2013-06-27 02:04:13 msvb-lab has quit (Quit: msvb-lab)
155 2013-06-27 02:04:14 reneg_ has quit (Quit: -a- Connection Timed Out)
156 2013-06-27 02:05:12 reneg_ has joined
157 2013-06-27 02:05:54 Vinnie_win_w has joined
158 2013-06-27 02:06:44 wallet43 has joined
159 2013-06-27 02:07:29 Vinnie_win has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
160 2013-06-27 02:10:13 BCB has joined
161 2013-06-27 02:10:29 ahbritto_ has joined
162 2013-06-27 02:11:15 brson has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
163 2013-06-27 02:12:48 agnostic98 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
164 2013-06-27 02:13:24 Faradayy has joined
165 2013-06-27 02:14:33 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
166 2013-06-27 02:14:41 seeingidog__ has joined
167 2013-06-27 02:18:38 Faradayyy has joined
168 2013-06-27 02:18:38 Faradayy has quit (Disconnected by services)
169 2013-06-27 02:19:23 xire has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
170 2013-06-27 02:19:31 Duly has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
171 2013-06-27 02:19:51 shesek has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
172 2013-06-27 02:19:56 Faradayyy has left ()
173 2013-06-27 02:20:07 digitalmagus2 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
174 2013-06-27 02:20:13 Duly has joined
175 2013-06-27 02:20:25 digitalmagus has joined
176 2013-06-27 02:20:29 seeingfurther has quit (Quit: seeingfurther)
177 2013-06-27 02:20:41 _milone has joined
178 2013-06-27 02:24:36 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
179 2013-06-27 02:26:33 freewil has joined
180 2013-06-27 02:27:01 seeingfurther has joined
181 2013-06-27 02:31:43 MobPhone has joined
182 2013-06-27 02:31:57 Wild_Bill has joined
183 2013-06-27 02:36:35 JKL1234- has joined
184 2013-06-27 02:38:14 grau has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
185 2013-06-27 02:38:31 grau has joined
186 2013-06-27 02:44:29 grau has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
187 2013-06-27 02:46:26 chorao has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
188 2013-06-27 02:46:52 chorao has joined
189 2013-06-27 02:46:52 chorao has quit (Changing host)
190 2013-06-27 02:46:52 chorao has joined
191 2013-06-27 02:47:02 seeingfurther has quit (Quit: seeingfurther)
192 2013-06-27 02:48:06 fanquake has joined
193 2013-06-27 02:48:20 dan__ has joined
194 2013-06-27 02:49:17 seeingfurther has joined
195 2013-06-27 02:49:33 agnostic98 has joined
196 2013-06-27 02:51:45 dan_ has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
197 2013-06-27 02:51:45 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
198 2013-06-27 03:03:25 Vinnie_win_w has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
199 2013-06-27 03:06:09 melvster has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
200 2013-06-27 03:07:40 prismatictrail has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
201 2013-06-27 03:08:26 macboz_ has quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
202 2013-06-27 03:08:40 Subo1978 has joined
203 2013-06-27 03:08:51 robocoin_ has joined
204 2013-06-27 03:11:38 eian has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
205 2013-06-27 03:11:42 robocoin has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
206 2013-06-27 03:11:57 wallet43 has joined
207 2013-06-27 03:12:05 macboz has joined
208 2013-06-27 03:12:19 Subo1978_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
209 2013-06-27 03:13:13 RoboTeddy has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
210 2013-06-27 03:17:25 malaimo has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
211 2013-06-27 03:17:49 JZavala has joined
212 2013-06-27 03:19:01 malaimo has joined
213 2013-06-27 03:20:27 Skav has joined
214 2013-06-27 03:20:40 milone_ has joined
215 2013-06-27 03:21:29 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
216 2013-06-27 03:22:22 Skav has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
217 2013-06-27 03:22:39 Skav has joined
218 2013-06-27 03:22:42 Skav has quit (Excess Flood)
219 2013-06-27 03:23:55 MobPhone has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
220 2013-06-27 03:24:35 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
221 2013-06-27 03:26:31 roconnor has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
222 2013-06-27 03:28:47 andyh2 has joined
223 2013-06-27 03:31:03 MobiusL has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
224 2013-06-27 03:32:00 MobiusL has joined
225 2013-06-27 03:33:34 Plinker_ has joined
226 2013-06-27 03:37:49 MobPhone has joined
227 2013-06-27 03:38:34 [7] has quit (Disconnected by services)
228 2013-06-27 03:38:43 TheSeven has joined
229 2013-06-27 03:41:06 phma has joined
230 2013-06-27 03:42:57 edwincheese has joined
231 2013-06-27 03:48:29 seeingidog__ has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
232 2013-06-27 03:48:55 molecular has joined
233 2013-06-27 03:50:14 agnostic98 has joined
234 2013-06-27 03:50:40 _milone has joined
235 2013-06-27 03:51:14 Maged has joined
236 2013-06-27 03:51:35 gjs278 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
237 2013-06-27 03:53:29 LorenzoMoney has quit (Quit: KVIrc 4.2.0 Equilibrium http://www.kvirc.net/)
238 2013-06-27 03:53:35 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
239 2013-06-27 03:54:14 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
240 2013-06-27 03:54:21 ericmuyser has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
241 2013-06-27 03:54:50 ericmuyser has joined
242 2013-06-27 03:55:05 ericmuyser has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
243 2013-06-27 03:55:30 ericmuyser has joined
244 2013-06-27 03:58:55 fishfish_ has joined
245 2013-06-27 03:59:06 seeingidog__ has joined
246 2013-06-27 04:01:48 Kingdom has joined
247 2013-06-27 04:01:57 shesek has joined
248 2013-06-27 04:02:14 fishfish has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
249 2013-06-27 04:02:14 <saivann> I should merge bitcoin.org pull req #212 tomorrow, unless someone want to add add a comment or ask for a delay
250 2013-06-27 04:02:15 <saivann> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/212
251 2013-06-27 04:02:55 <saivann> This pull requests adds the "About bitcoin.org" page, with explanations about the owners, the goals of bitcoin.org and steps to help or report a problem with bitcoin.org
252 2013-06-27 04:04:12 <gmaxwell> It could use some english massaging, I'm just not up to it right now. The substance sounds fine to me as I think I said.
253 2013-06-27 04:04:27 <gmaxwell> nanotube: midnightmagic: ^ care to do some english tinkering?
254 2013-06-27 04:06:22 <saivann> Would be welcome, of course
255 2013-06-27 04:12:59 <Luke-Jr> Bitcoin.org is not the official Bitcoin website <-- "not an official.."
256 2013-06-27 04:13:50 <saivann> Luke-Jr, noted
257 2013-06-27 04:14:10 <Luke-Jr> You can report any problem or help to improve bitcoin.org on github by opening an issue or a pull request in english. <-- capitalize GitHub and English
258 2013-06-27 04:14:30 <Luke-Jr> other than that, looks good to me
259 2013-06-27 04:14:46 <saivann> Thanks
260 2013-06-27 04:15:03 <saivann> These were big changes :)
261 2013-06-27 04:17:14 wallet43 has joined
262 2013-06-27 04:18:06 <Luke-Jr> http://codepad.org/1zUKf4gn <-- thoughts on portable strerror hack? :/
263 2013-06-27 04:26:08 melvster has joined
264 2013-06-27 04:26:33 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
265 2013-06-27 04:29:24 <gmaxwell> Gitian on LWN: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/555761/c2ff2739171620e9/ (if you're not a LWN subscriber, you should be, it's pretty great)
266 2013-06-27 04:30:17 <nanotube> saivann: posted comment on github
267 2013-06-27 04:31:01 <gmaxwell> nanotube: thanks!
268 2013-06-27 04:31:15 <saivann> nanotube : Thanks. So you would say "who controls Bitcoin.?"
269 2013-06-27 04:31:21 brson has joined
270 2013-06-27 04:31:34 <saivann> Or Then...
271 2013-06-27 04:32:35 <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: considering things that gitian can't solve, like digital signatures, I wonder if software to compare is more important than software to compile
272 2013-06-27 04:32:48 <Luke-Jr> though with compiler optimization differences, that might be more difficult
273 2013-06-27 04:33:15 triciam has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
274 2013-06-27 04:33:42 <gmaxwell> The signature stuff can be accomplished with sutiable masking though.
275 2013-06-27 04:33:49 <gmaxwell> which isn't exactly tricky.
276 2013-06-27 04:34:21 <nanotube> saivann: then... :)
277 2013-06-27 04:34:31 <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: so could timestamps
278 2013-06-27 04:34:40 <saivann> nanotube, Dumb question, but I've got to be sure, thanks
279 2013-06-27 04:34:46 <nanotube> :)
280 2013-06-27 04:36:24 <Luke-Jr> saivann: "thenâ¦" if you want to be unicode-correct ;)
281 2013-06-27 04:40:51 andyh2 has quit (Quit: Leaving...)
282 2013-06-27 04:42:24 triciam has joined
283 2013-06-27 04:42:31 <nanotube> Luke-Jr: hehe, the thought of you and your unicode ellipses did cross my mind when i made that suggestion :) omg goomh!
284 2013-06-27 04:42:55 RoboTeddy has joined
285 2013-06-27 04:43:25 <gmaxwell> He's not the only person to use them;
286 2013-06-27 04:43:27 <gmaxwell> â¦
287 2013-06-27 04:45:13 reneg_ has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
288 2013-06-27 04:45:32 reneg has joined
289 2013-06-27 04:45:56 reneg is now known as Guest18904
290 2013-06-27 04:49:06 triciam has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
291 2013-06-27 04:50:24 triciam has joined
292 2013-06-27 04:52:06 <Arnavion> Hipster, the lot of you!
293 2013-06-27 04:52:31 agnostic98 has joined
294 2013-06-27 04:52:57 <Arnavion> You'll have to pry my ... from my cold dead hands
295 2013-06-27 04:54:10 Eiii has quit ()
296 2013-06-27 04:56:30 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
297 2013-06-27 04:58:44 brson has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
298 2013-06-27 04:59:36 RazielZ has joined
299 2013-06-27 05:02:42 triciam has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
300 2013-06-27 05:03:35 andyh2 has joined
301 2013-06-27 05:04:41 prismatictrail has joined
302 2013-06-27 05:11:22 A2501 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
303 2013-06-27 05:11:47 A2501 has joined
304 2013-06-27 05:12:41 owowo has joined
305 2013-06-27 05:14:23 Guest29596 has left ()
306 2013-06-27 05:15:02 macboz_ has joined
307 2013-06-27 05:17:31 Wild_Bill has quit (Quit: ASCII a stupid question, get a stupid ANSI!)
308 2013-06-27 05:18:11 LorenzoMoney has joined
309 2013-06-27 05:18:14 macboz has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
310 2013-06-27 05:22:15 grau has joined
311 2013-06-27 05:22:28 wallet43 has joined
312 2013-06-27 05:22:43 LorenzoMoney has left ("Once you know what it is you want to be true, instinct is a very useful device for enabling you to know that it is")
313 2013-06-27 05:23:37 panzer has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
314 2013-06-27 05:23:37 agnostic98 has joined
315 2013-06-27 05:25:06 panzer has joined
316 2013-06-27 05:27:46 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
317 2013-06-27 05:27:54 owowo has quit (Quit: sayonara)
318 2013-06-27 05:30:35 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
319 2013-06-27 05:32:23 knotwork has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
320 2013-06-27 05:33:26 knotwork has joined
321 2013-06-27 05:34:15 Thepok has joined
322 2013-06-27 05:35:42 bbbrian has joined
323 2013-06-27 05:48:20 RazielZ has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
324 2013-06-27 05:50:21 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
325 2013-06-27 05:54:09 yubrew has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
326 2013-06-27 05:54:38 agnostic98 has joined
327 2013-06-27 05:57:11 iddo_ has left ()
328 2013-06-27 05:57:39 iddo has joined
329 2013-06-27 05:58:03 agnostic_ has joined
330 2013-06-27 05:58:27 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
331 2013-06-27 05:58:31 <imd23> I get "Private key for address XXX is not known (code -4)"
332 2013-06-27 05:58:42 <imd23> any idea?
333 2013-06-27 05:58:56 Odyessus has joined
334 2013-06-27 05:58:59 justusranvier has joined
335 2013-06-27 05:59:41 da2ce7_d has joined
336 2013-06-27 06:01:30 da2ce7_d2 has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
337 2013-06-27 06:04:26 <Luke-Jr> imd23: encrypted wallet
338 2013-06-27 06:06:27 <imd23> yeah
339 2013-06-27 06:06:33 <imd23> but already unlocked
340 2013-06-27 06:07:02 <imd23> Luke-Jr: maybe I unlocked it wrong...
341 2013-06-27 06:08:14 <Luke-Jr> maybe
342 2013-06-27 06:08:36 <imd23> timeout 0 is infinite or none?
343 2013-06-27 06:09:02 <imd23> it was none
344 2013-06-27 06:09:09 <imd23> I got it now. it's working :)
345 2013-06-27 06:10:15 <imd23> Luke-Jr: Thanks
346 2013-06-27 06:10:48 <imd23> Luke-Jr: do you know how can I create a transaction wallet agnostic?
347 2013-06-27 06:11:03 <Luke-Jr> ?
348 2013-06-27 06:11:10 <imd23> I mean, typing everything in the command line , abstracting the wallet database
349 2013-06-27 06:11:16 <imd23> like If I have everything printed.
350 2013-06-27 06:11:19 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
351 2013-06-27 06:11:54 <imd23> Luke-Jr: is it with sendrawtransaction ?
352 2013-06-27 06:13:04 Ferroh_ has quit (Quit: *SMOKE BOMB*)
353 2013-06-27 06:13:28 <Luke-Jr> probably
354 2013-06-27 06:14:47 <imd23> Luke-Jr: I am developing a new online service. Can I implement everything in my service to get the signrawtransaction work and use bitcoind as a gateway to the bitcoin network? I am asking because of the load.
355 2013-06-27 06:14:53 <imd23> load/performance
356 2013-06-27 06:15:53 <imd23> I mean, may be 50 transactions / minute or more, I have no idea the load we will have
357 2013-06-27 06:16:44 saivann has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
358 2013-06-27 06:17:44 <jchp> 50 transactions per minute is quite a lot
359 2013-06-27 06:17:56 justusranvier has joined
360 2013-06-27 06:18:31 <imd23> ok
361 2013-06-27 06:18:49 <imd23> I have no idea I told you...
362 2013-06-27 06:19:03 <imd23> anyway, from a technical point of view
363 2013-06-27 06:19:07 <imd23> is 50 a lot?
364 2013-06-27 06:19:37 <jchp> sendrawtransaction can handle that no problem, i'm just saying it's unlikely you'll be doing that
365 2013-06-27 06:21:34 <imd23> jchp: awesome
366 2013-06-27 06:21:56 <imd23> yeah, I hope everyone to use our new exchange idea/service
367 2013-06-27 06:22:08 <imd23> will be awesome, but I still have to learn a lot
368 2013-06-27 06:22:19 <imd23> so.. will take some time to get it up
369 2013-06-27 06:24:19 <Luke-Jr> imd23: you'd have to implement the wallet yourself for what it sounds like you want
370 2013-06-27 06:25:21 molecular has quit (Quit: Leaving)
371 2013-06-27 06:27:14 <Luke-Jr> imd23: for reference, note that the Bitcoin blockchain protocol can only sustain up to 195 transactions per minute, so if you expect to do 50/m, you'll really need to look into alternatives
372 2013-06-27 06:27:17 saivann has joined
373 2013-06-27 06:27:35 saivann has quit (Client Quit)
374 2013-06-27 06:27:44 saivann has joined
375 2013-06-27 06:27:45 wallet43 has joined
376 2013-06-27 06:28:05 Jackneill has joined
377 2013-06-27 06:28:25 <Luke-Jr> imd23: unfortunately, everything is still pretty immature :/
378 2013-06-27 06:29:23 bazyl has joined
379 2013-06-27 06:36:55 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
380 2013-06-27 06:37:39 Red__b has left ()
381 2013-06-27 06:38:10 chorao has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
382 2013-06-27 06:41:27 Guest18904 has quit (Quit: -a- Connection Timed Out)
383 2013-06-27 06:41:43 reneg has joined
384 2013-06-27 06:42:07 reneg is now known as Guest59311
385 2013-06-27 06:44:44 Odyessus has quit (Quit: Colloquy for iPad - http://colloquy.mobi)
386 2013-06-27 06:45:27 Kingdom has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
387 2013-06-27 06:46:51 <imd23> Luke-Jr: I hope so, but we probably won't
388 2013-06-27 06:47:01 <imd23> at first time I mean.
389 2013-06-27 06:47:21 <imd23> now.. when I do a "getrawtransaction"
390 2013-06-27 06:47:22 RazielZ has joined
391 2013-06-27 06:47:30 <imd23> does it give me the whole chain?
392 2013-06-27 06:48:23 eoss has joined
393 2013-06-27 06:49:33 fishfish_ has quit (Quit: Zzzzz..zzzzz)
394 2013-06-27 06:54:20 <imd23> ohâ¦I've got it now. The transaction I was looking at was big because it had lot of vouts
395 2013-06-27 06:54:22 <imd23> :)
396 2013-06-27 06:55:23 edwincheese has quit (Quit: edwincheese)
397 2013-06-27 06:56:33 A2501 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
398 2013-06-27 06:57:44 Ferroh has joined
399 2013-06-27 07:01:47 Arnavion has quit (Quit: Arnavion)
400 2013-06-27 07:02:05 gjs278 has joined
401 2013-06-27 07:02:58 grau has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
402 2013-06-27 07:03:11 [\\\] has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
403 2013-06-27 07:03:11 grau has joined
404 2013-06-27 07:04:34 saulimus has joined
405 2013-06-27 07:09:59 MobPhone has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
406 2013-06-27 07:10:53 MobPhone has joined
407 2013-06-27 07:12:14 bazyl has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
408 2013-06-27 07:15:36 FredEE has quit (Quit: FredEE)
409 2013-06-27 07:16:55 michagogo has joined
410 2013-06-27 07:20:36 milone_ has joined
411 2013-06-27 07:20:54 michagogo_ has joined
412 2013-06-27 07:20:54 michagogo is now known as Guest981
413 2013-06-27 07:20:54 Guest981 has quit (Killed (barjavel.freenode.net (Nickname regained by services)))
414 2013-06-27 07:20:54 michagogo_ is now known as michagogo
415 2013-06-27 07:24:00 seeingidog__ has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
416 2013-06-27 07:24:40 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
417 2013-06-27 07:28:24 eian has joined
418 2013-06-27 07:28:44 seeingfurther has quit (Quit: seeingfurther)
419 2013-06-27 07:30:01 FredEE has joined
420 2013-06-27 07:30:50 saivann has quit ()
421 2013-06-27 07:32:53 saivann has joined
422 2013-06-27 07:33:30 wallet43 has joined
423 2013-06-27 07:36:50 eian has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
424 2013-06-27 07:38:01 Insti has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
425 2013-06-27 07:39:30 Insty has joined
426 2013-06-27 07:40:21 agnostic_ has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
427 2013-06-27 07:40:51 agnostic98 has joined
428 2013-06-27 07:42:45 wallet43 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
429 2013-06-27 07:43:47 Arnavion has joined
430 2013-06-27 07:46:51 clarkm has joined
431 2013-06-27 07:46:51 clarkm has quit (Changing host)
432 2013-06-27 07:46:51 clarkm has joined
433 2013-06-27 07:49:22 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
434 2013-06-27 07:50:39 _milone has joined
435 2013-06-27 07:53:38 sark has quit (!~sark@37-252-106-157.ip.skylogicnet.com|Read error: Connection reset by peer)
436 2013-06-27 07:53:41 Internet13 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
437 2013-06-27 07:53:52 Silverion has joined
438 2013-06-27 07:54:12 skeledrew1 has joined
439 2013-06-27 07:54:14 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
440 2013-06-27 07:54:27 yubrew has joined
441 2013-06-27 07:54:35 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
442 2013-06-27 07:54:47 sark has joined
443 2013-06-27 07:55:08 agnostic98 has joined
444 2013-06-27 07:55:19 PRab_ has joined
445 2013-06-27 07:55:19 skeledrew has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
446 2013-06-27 07:55:51 Apexseals has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
447 2013-06-27 07:56:01 Habbie_ has joined
448 2013-06-27 07:56:01 loltu has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
449 2013-06-27 07:56:23 PRab has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
450 2013-06-27 07:56:24 petertodd has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
451 2013-06-27 07:56:30 Apexseals has joined
452 2013-06-27 07:56:55 emryss has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
453 2013-06-27 07:57:24 fishfish has joined
454 2013-06-27 07:57:27 BNCatDIGISHELL has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
455 2013-06-27 07:57:47 xeroc_ has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
456 2013-06-27 07:57:53 loltu has joined
457 2013-06-27 07:57:58 RoboTeddy has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
458 2013-06-27 07:57:59 da2ce7_d has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
459 2013-06-27 07:57:59 Habbie has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
460 2013-06-27 07:58:17 petertodd has joined
461 2013-06-27 07:58:31 stavs has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
462 2013-06-27 07:58:31 nx201 has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
463 2013-06-27 07:58:57 yubrew has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
464 2013-06-27 07:59:03 B0g4r7 has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
465 2013-06-27 07:59:09 execut3 has joined
466 2013-06-27 07:59:13 nx201 has joined
467 2013-06-27 07:59:20 xeroc has joined
468 2013-06-27 07:59:23 Internet13 has joined
469 2013-06-27 08:02:42 BNCatDIGISHELL has joined
470 2013-06-27 08:03:02 stavs has joined
471 2013-06-27 08:03:28 petertodd is now known as Guest70692
472 2013-06-27 08:03:39 fishfish has quit (Quit: Bye!)
473 2013-06-27 08:03:45 B0g4r7 has joined
474 2013-06-27 08:05:13 theorb has joined
475 2013-06-27 08:05:13 wallet43 has joined
476 2013-06-27 08:05:14 setkeh has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
477 2013-06-27 08:05:26 BCBot` has joined
478 2013-06-27 08:05:59 a_meteorite has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
479 2013-06-27 08:06:09 BCBot has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
480 2013-06-27 08:06:12 enquirer has quit (Read error: No buffer space available)
481 2013-06-27 08:06:32 a_meteorite has joined
482 2013-06-27 08:06:40 theorb is now known as theorbtwo
483 2013-06-27 08:06:49 enquirer2 has joined
484 2013-06-27 08:06:50 a_meteorite has quit (Changing host)
485 2013-06-27 08:06:50 a_meteorite has joined
486 2013-06-27 08:07:18 Habbie_ has quit (Write error: Broken pipe)
487 2013-06-27 08:07:43 RoboTeddy has joined
488 2013-06-27 08:08:18 Toresh has quit (Ping timeout: 253 seconds)
489 2013-06-27 08:08:18 mps has quit (Ping timeout: 253 seconds)
490 2013-06-27 08:08:25 mpv has joined
491 2013-06-27 08:08:34 Toresh_ has joined
492 2013-06-27 08:11:14 mappum has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
493 2013-06-27 08:12:02 Raizen has joined
494 2013-06-27 08:14:24 setkeh has joined
495 2013-06-27 08:26:00 Habbie has joined
496 2013-06-27 08:40:28 ShapeShifter499 has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
497 2013-06-27 08:41:16 jchp has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
498 2013-06-27 08:43:39 Toresh_ has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
499 2013-06-27 08:44:04 Toresh has joined
500 2013-06-27 08:48:42 Arnavion has quit (Quit: Arnavion)
501 2013-06-27 08:49:57 mrkent2 has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
502 2013-06-27 08:50:06 Arnavion has joined
503 2013-06-27 08:51:36 [\\\] has joined
504 2013-06-27 08:53:27 ShapeShifter499 has joined
505 2013-06-27 08:53:56 paracyst has quit ()
506 2013-06-27 08:55:21 Insty has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
507 2013-06-27 08:55:58 wallet43 has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
508 2013-06-27 09:00:46 ericmuyser has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
509 2013-06-27 09:01:21 agnostic98 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
510 2013-06-27 09:05:27 ericmuyser has joined
511 2013-06-27 09:05:31 wallet43 has joined
512 2013-06-27 09:08:20 ericmuys_ has joined
513 2013-06-27 09:08:31 t7 has joined
514 2013-06-27 09:09:57 ericmuyser has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
515 2013-06-27 09:11:49 BGL has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
516 2013-06-27 09:12:27 FredEE has quit (Quit: FredEE)
517 2013-06-27 09:12:44 ericmuys_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
518 2013-06-27 09:14:33 fanquake has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
519 2013-06-27 09:18:06 fanquake has joined
520 2013-06-27 09:19:14 RazielXYZ has joined
521 2013-06-27 09:19:21 Insti has joined
522 2013-06-27 09:21:47 RazielZ has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
523 2013-06-27 09:27:44 Raizen has quit (Quit: Leaving)
524 2013-06-27 09:27:55 eoss has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
525 2013-06-27 09:31:04 PRab has joined
526 2013-06-27 09:31:32 macboz__ has joined
527 2013-06-27 09:31:40 KillYourTV has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
528 2013-06-27 09:32:14 Jamesz has joined
529 2013-06-27 09:32:24 Phil21 has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
530 2013-06-27 09:32:28 PRab_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
531 2013-06-27 09:32:30 Phil21 has joined
532 2013-06-27 09:32:58 Subo1978_ has joined
533 2013-06-27 09:33:20 Subo1978 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
534 2013-06-27 09:33:32 JZavala has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
535 2013-06-27 09:34:00 cypher has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
536 2013-06-27 09:34:09 macboz_ has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
537 2013-06-27 09:34:21 rlifchitz has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
538 2013-06-27 09:35:03 redeeman has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
539 2013-06-27 09:35:31 toffoo has quit ()
540 2013-06-27 09:36:09 implr has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
541 2013-06-27 09:37:29 redeeman has joined
542 2013-06-27 09:37:48 i2pRelay has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
543 2013-06-27 09:37:55 cypher has joined
544 2013-06-27 09:39:04 KillYourTV has joined
545 2013-06-27 09:42:10 rlifchitz has joined
546 2013-06-27 09:44:27 nym has joined
547 2013-06-27 09:44:45 NimeshNeema has joined
548 2013-06-27 09:45:22 i2pRelay has joined
549 2013-06-27 09:45:28 mariorz_ has joined
550 2013-06-27 09:45:51 BGL has joined
551 2013-06-27 09:46:01 iddo has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
552 2013-06-27 09:46:16 iddo has joined
553 2013-06-27 09:50:00 Pengoo has quit (Quit: KVIrc 4.1.3 Equilibrium http://www.kvirc.net/)
554 2013-06-27 09:55:31 Pengoo has joined
555 2013-06-27 09:57:35 taha has joined
556 2013-06-27 09:59:44 agnostic98 has joined
557 2013-06-27 10:01:48 taha has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
558 2013-06-27 10:02:54 Arnavion has quit (Quit: Arnavion)
559 2013-06-27 10:03:39 Arnavion has joined
560 2013-06-27 10:05:03 Toresh has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
561 2013-06-27 10:05:35 milone_ has joined
562 2013-06-27 10:07:04 Toresh has joined
563 2013-06-27 10:07:17 Spiralvortex has quit ()
564 2013-06-27 10:07:56 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
565 2013-06-27 10:09:20 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
566 2013-06-27 10:17:20 vigilyn3 has quit (Quit: Leaving)
567 2013-06-27 10:17:49 vigilyn has joined
568 2013-06-27 10:17:58 nomailing has joined
569 2013-06-27 10:21:28 msvb-lab has joined
570 2013-06-27 10:21:52 imd23_ has joined
571 2013-06-27 10:23:03 imd23 has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
572 2013-06-27 10:23:04 imd23_ is now known as imd23
573 2013-06-27 10:25:15 dansmith_btc has joined
574 2013-06-27 10:29:57 taha has joined
575 2013-06-27 10:33:12 triciam has joined
576 2013-06-27 10:35:39 _milone has joined
577 2013-06-27 10:38:47 [BNC]dansmithbtc has joined
578 2013-06-27 10:38:59 dansmith_btc has quit (Quit: Leaving)
579 2013-06-27 10:39:18 o3u_ has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
580 2013-06-27 10:39:35 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
581 2013-06-27 10:39:49 macboz__ has quit (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
582 2013-06-27 10:39:53 [BNC]dansmithbtc has left ()
583 2013-06-27 10:40:25 dansmith_btc has joined
584 2013-06-27 10:43:04 <dansmith_btc> HI, as I understand the only use of PUBkey is to derive a btc address. Apart from that, are there any security implications in revealing one's PUBkey to the world?
585 2013-06-27 10:43:53 daybyter has joined
586 2013-06-27 10:44:50 o3u has joined
587 2013-06-27 10:50:46 grau_ has joined
588 2013-06-27 10:52:47 grau_ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
589 2013-06-27 10:53:46 grau has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
590 2013-06-27 10:54:33 <warren> dansmith_btc: they know your identity
591 2013-06-27 10:54:59 <dansmith_btc> warren, OK, but nothing apart from that, I guess?
592 2013-06-27 10:55:18 <warren> that I'm aware of
593 2013-06-27 10:55:48 RoboTeddy has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
594 2013-06-27 10:55:58 <gmaxwell> huh? identity?
595 2013-06-27 10:56:12 <gmaxwell> from an identity perspective knowing a pubkey is the same as knowing an address.
596 2013-06-27 10:56:41 <gmaxwell> dansmith_btc: knowing the public key would enable someone with some kind of attack on ECC to begin trying to crack it. This is a highly theoretical concern.
597 2013-06-27 10:56:53 _arch has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
598 2013-06-27 10:58:21 grau has joined
599 2013-06-27 10:58:43 <dansmith_btc> gmaxwell, sounds good.
600 2013-06-27 10:59:38 Toresh has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
601 2013-06-27 11:00:17 agnostic98 has joined
602 2013-06-27 11:01:30 saulimus has quit (Quit: saulimus)
603 2013-06-27 11:01:48 Toresh has joined
604 2013-06-27 11:03:38 triciam has quit (Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in)
605 2013-06-27 11:03:40 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
606 2013-06-27 11:04:53 <t7> i thought address was derived from priv key?
607 2013-06-27 11:05:19 triciam has joined
608 2013-06-27 11:05:22 jchp has joined
609 2013-06-27 11:05:23 ericmuyser has joined
610 2013-06-27 11:05:26 <t7> and address was pub key
611 2013-06-27 11:06:34 Namworld has quit ()
612 2013-06-27 11:07:34 <kinlo> t7: the public key is derrived from the private key, and the bitcoin address is derrived from the public key by using several hashing rounds followed by an encoding round (base58+checksum)
613 2013-06-27 11:10:02 ericmuyser has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
614 2013-06-27 11:11:20 <melvster> in case anyone missed it: ftp://ftp.inf.ethz.ch/pub/publications/tech-reports/7xx/789.pdf
615 2013-06-27 11:11:31 <melvster> double spend attack reported
616 2013-06-27 11:11:46 Jackneill has quit (Quit: Leaving)
617 2013-06-27 11:12:48 Jackneill has joined
618 2013-06-27 11:13:30 makomk has joined
619 2013-06-27 11:13:57 eian has joined
620 2013-06-27 11:14:43 <gmaxwell> melvster: Are you one of the authors of that? it would be polite to cite the many times that transaction pattern has been discussed on the forum.
621 2013-06-27 11:16:27 <gmaxwell> This isn't new, the same is true for anything with respect to is IsStandard rules, and it's one of the reasons specifically cited in telling people to consider unconfirmed transactions unsafe.
622 2013-06-27 11:17:13 <gmaxwell> Even without any IsStandard rule change any number of similar transaction patterns could be used to the same end.
623 2013-06-27 11:18:19 <gmaxwell> (e.g. send a transaction which is non-standard but still accepted by some miners; or simultaniously send the victim one transaction while sending many miners another, etc.
624 2013-06-27 11:18:22 <gmaxwell> )
625 2013-06-27 11:20:39 milone_ has joined
626 2013-06-27 11:24:36 Jackneill has quit (Quit: Leaving)
627 2013-06-27 11:24:56 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
628 2013-06-27 11:26:00 <melvster> gmaxwell: no im not an author, do you have a pointer to the discussions? safe / unsafe is not a binary thing
629 2013-06-27 11:26:42 <sipa> it's an inevitability when relay rules changes
630 2013-06-27 11:26:50 <sipa> that some nodes will accept and other won't
631 2013-06-27 11:27:11 <sipa> but the end result (everyone enforcing strict signatures) will be a strictly better situation for everyone
632 2013-06-27 11:27:44 Jackneill has joined
633 2013-06-27 11:29:04 [\\\\] has joined
634 2013-06-27 11:29:36 <melvster> sipa: so this attack was not 'introduced' with 0.8.3 but was always there?
635 2013-06-27 11:29:41 one_zero has quit ()
636 2013-06-27 11:30:29 <sipa> the 'attack' is that 0-conf transaction acceptable can be cheated, and any change in relay rules amplifies that
637 2013-06-27 11:31:01 <sipa> and yes, 0.8.2 no long relaying non-canonical signatures is an example of that
638 2013-06-27 11:31:07 <sipa> but so is the dust relay change rule
639 2013-06-27 11:31:18 <sipa> or the non-standardness of 0-value outputs earlier
640 2013-06-27 11:31:34 <sipa> or the enforcing of p2sh transactions before that
641 2013-06-27 11:31:53 <melvster> sipa: thanks for explaining
642 2013-06-27 11:32:17 andyh2 has quit (Quit: Leaving...)
643 2013-06-27 11:32:35 <gmaxwell> I responded to the post on the bitcoin development list. You might be interested in that.
644 2013-06-27 11:33:00 darkee has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
645 2013-06-27 11:33:05 <TD> i like how some people publish a "paper" on these things when i'd have just made a mailing list or forum post
646 2013-06-27 11:33:06 yubrew has joined
647 2013-06-27 11:33:32 darkee has joined
648 2013-06-27 11:34:30 <melvster> gmaxwell: which thread is that? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=11425;sa=showPosts
649 2013-06-27 11:35:07 <gmaxwell> melvster: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=CAAS2fgRg8B_j%3DLuf31R8-%2BvqOWQOUcUDof8wdq79_Ar9YuUm9g%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=bitcoin-development
650 2013-06-27 11:35:27 <melvster> oh thanks
651 2013-06-27 11:35:42 <gmaxwell> esp see the forum thread I linked to.
652 2013-06-27 11:36:34 <melvster> thx, strange that post didnt yet make it to my inbox
653 2013-06-27 11:36:41 <sipa> neither did it here
654 2013-06-27 11:38:11 <sipa> now it did
655 2013-06-27 11:38:21 <melvster> me too
656 2013-06-27 11:38:29 mrkent has joined
657 2013-06-27 11:38:29 mrkent has quit (Changing host)
658 2013-06-27 11:38:29 mrkent has joined
659 2013-06-27 11:38:33 <gmaxwell> I saw it!
660 2013-06-27 11:39:43 grau has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
661 2013-06-27 11:40:45 <gmaxwell> sipa: I've been resisting linking them to http://githubredir.debian.net/ because I'm sure they'd set me on fire with some weird ranting about linux debian somethinganohter. :P
662 2013-06-27 11:41:40 grau has joined
663 2013-06-27 11:41:46 <gmaxwell> (lots of debian packages pull directly from git tag urls like ours)
664 2013-06-27 11:41:50 <sipa> gmaxwell: i believe (trying to) show you (try to) understand is more helpful :)
665 2013-06-27 11:42:32 <gmaxwell> :)
666 2013-06-27 11:43:01 <gmaxwell> No real point in arguing it, its weird that we don't do freestanding source tarballs. I must just be in a contrary mood.
667 2013-06-27 11:43:11 <gmaxwell> But the demand still seems inexplicable to me.
668 2013-06-27 11:43:55 <BlueMatt> github itself will give you freestanding git tag tarballs
669 2013-06-27 11:44:03 <BlueMatt> no need to use any githubredir or such fancyness
670 2013-06-27 11:44:27 <BlueMatt> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/archive/$TAG.zip
671 2013-06-27 11:44:42 <BlueMatt> I think you can replace zip with tar.gz too
672 2013-06-27 11:45:48 <sipa> BlueMatt: they argue that the zips/tgzs there are generated on-the-fly, and don't guarantee consistency
673 2013-06-27 11:46:03 <sipa> (their checksums may change)
674 2013-06-27 11:46:11 <BlueMatt> meh
675 2013-06-27 11:46:18 <sipa> i don't know if that's true, but if it is, it's a reasonable argument why it's a problem for them
676 2013-06-27 11:46:37 <gmaxwell> I'd like to know if it's true.
677 2013-06-27 11:46:57 <gmaxwell> It would be a better argument that they're not cryptographically signedâ except none of these things check cryptographic signatures. :(
678 2013-06-27 11:48:29 <BlueMatt> they should git checkout the tag's hash
679 2013-06-27 11:48:41 Ferroh has quit (Quit: *SMOKE BOMB*)
680 2013-06-27 11:48:47 nanotube has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
681 2013-06-27 11:49:00 mrkent has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
682 2013-06-27 11:49:21 stretchwarren has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
683 2013-06-27 11:51:41 nanotube has joined
684 2013-06-27 11:52:28 stretchwarren has joined
685 2013-06-27 11:52:44 eian has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
686 2013-06-27 11:55:48 grau has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
687 2013-06-27 11:56:23 grau has joined
688 2013-06-27 12:06:52 implr has joined
689 2013-06-27 12:09:55 <michagogo> Is there software out there to easily create blocks to your specifications?
690 2013-06-27 12:10:12 <michagogo> For example, adding certain data, or a specific non-broadcast transaction?
691 2013-06-27 12:10:30 metabyte has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
692 2013-06-27 12:10:37 <TD> well, there are libraries
693 2013-06-27 12:10:50 metabyte has joined
694 2013-06-27 12:12:47 user-_ has joined
695 2013-06-27 12:14:26 taha has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
696 2013-06-27 12:14:53 BW^- has joined
697 2013-06-27 12:14:56 <BW^-> what's the nickname of he who develops BitcoinJ?
698 2013-06-27 12:15:10 <sipa> maybe TD knows
699 2013-06-27 12:15:10 <gmaxwell> TD: quick, hide.
700 2013-06-27 12:15:31 <SomeoneWeird> HE WHO DEVELOPS BITCOINJ SHALL NOT BE NAMED
701 2013-06-27 12:15:40 <TD> hi
702 2013-06-27 12:15:41 Plinker_ has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
703 2013-06-27 12:15:57 <BW^-> someoneweird: i had his nick.. can't remember now
704 2013-06-27 12:16:00 <BW^-> someoneweird: why do you say that anyhow?
705 2013-06-27 12:16:11 <BW^-> bitcoinj is the highest quality bitcoin librayr implementation right?
706 2013-06-27 12:16:29 <TD> that's rather subjective. i don't know, i'm not really familiar with the others.
707 2013-06-27 12:16:29 <sipa> BW^-: TD is the primary author of BitcoinJ, in case that wasn't clear
708 2013-06-27 12:16:40 <BW^-> cool :)
709 2013-06-27 12:16:41 <TD> i'd like to think it's of a decent quality, especially around documentation
710 2013-06-27 12:16:49 <TD> but it certainly has its fair share of bugs
711 2013-06-27 12:16:55 <BW^-> TD: like what bugs?
712 2013-06-27 12:17:03 <BW^-> sipa: k thx
713 2013-06-27 12:17:16 <BW^-> would there be any other bitcoin library implementation that would be more mature than bitcoinj, i wouldn't think so??
714 2013-06-27 12:17:31 <TD> well just look at the bug tracker :-) assertEquals(1, myWallet.getTransactions(true).size());
715 2013-06-27 12:17:31 <TD> assertTrue(myWallet.getTransaction(coinbase.getHash()).isCoinBase());
716 2013-06-27 12:17:32 <TD> oops
717 2013-06-27 12:17:36 <TD> stupid X keyboard
718 2013-06-27 12:17:42 <TD> the bug tracker here being - https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/issues/list
719 2013-06-27 12:20:10 <TD> BW^-: where are you going with this? what do you want to do?
720 2013-06-27 12:20:30 daybyter has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
721 2013-06-27 12:20:55 <BW^-> td: 1sec
722 2013-06-27 12:22:37 <BW^-> td: basically a general-purpose use with lots of hooks all over
723 2013-06-27 12:22:47 <BW^-> so like, it needs to work without bugs, about like that
724 2013-06-27 12:24:20 rdymac has joined
725 2013-06-27 12:24:52 <TD> so it needs to do everything, be fully customizable, and have no bugs?
726 2013-06-27 12:24:56 <TD> good luck with that :-)
727 2013-06-27 12:25:07 <TD> i'd suggest reading the bitcoinj docs to get a feel for if it can do what you want. bugs can be fixed.
728 2013-06-27 12:25:09 <michagogo> What's wrong with this command:
729 2013-06-27 12:25:09 <michagogo> createrawtransaction {"txid":"txid_here","vout":0} {"address_here":1}
730 2013-06-27 12:25:20 <michagogo> As entered into the Console of bitcoin-qt
731 2013-06-27 12:25:21 <TD> bitcoinj IS used by quite a lot of projects, somehow they manage, so it can't be unusably buggy
732 2013-06-27 12:25:25 <michagogo> (don't worry, using testnet)
733 2013-06-27 12:25:55 <michagogo> (also, will that send a bitcoin or a satoshi?)
734 2013-06-27 12:26:18 <sipa> michagogo: what error do you get?
735 2013-06-27 12:26:50 <michagogo> Error: Error parsing JSON:{txid:address_here,vout:0}
736 2013-06-27 12:26:55 <michagogo> erm, txid_here
737 2013-06-27 12:27:09 <BW^-> td: :))
738 2013-06-27 12:27:26 <BW^-> td: i believe the docs are fine enough, i mean basically all the transacting is in there and really works right?
739 2013-06-27 12:27:37 <sipa> michagogo: can you paste me the exact command?
740 2013-06-27 12:27:40 <sipa> michagogo: perhaps in PM
741 2013-06-27 12:27:52 <TD> BW^-: you can send money around and receive it, yes.
742 2013-06-27 12:28:02 <TD> i think your best bet is just to try it and see if it works
743 2013-06-27 12:28:08 taha has joined
744 2013-06-27 12:28:46 <BW^-> so, you should just use a bitcoind as "firewall" as not to trig anything unintended in it - the bitcoind would "normalize" the input
745 2013-06-27 12:28:50 <BW^-> td: yeah sounds like that
746 2013-06-27 12:28:51 Jamesz has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
747 2013-06-27 12:28:51 dansmith_btc has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
748 2013-06-27 12:29:02 <TD> yeah
749 2013-06-27 12:29:07 <BW^-> in all cases, it is the best bitcoin library around right?
750 2013-06-27 12:29:08 <TD> that's a good way to use the library.
751 2013-06-27 12:29:09 <BW^-> in any language
752 2013-06-27 12:29:10 <TD> lol
753 2013-06-27 12:29:13 <sipa> michagogo: i think you may need some escaping
754 2013-06-27 12:29:15 <BW^-> :))
755 2013-06-27 12:29:23 <michagogo> What needs to be escaped?
756 2013-06-27 12:29:28 <sipa> don't know the exact semantics of the console
757 2013-06-27 12:29:33 <BW^-> td: ah, can i ask you some questions as i go along reading the source, about how it fits together?
758 2013-06-27 12:29:33 <sipa> but iirc it mimics a unix shell
759 2013-06-27 12:29:42 <sipa> so you can't use { directly
760 2013-06-27 12:29:54 <michagogo> so s/{/\{/?
761 2013-06-27 12:29:55 <TD> yes, of course. bear in mind that bitcoinj was designed for small devices like mobile phones and still is driven by that need, mostly
762 2013-06-27 12:30:02 <BW^-> aha
763 2013-06-27 12:30:05 <TD> its support for things people often want on the server is not that great
764 2013-06-27 12:30:10 <BW^-> td: how does that impact it, in terms of performance or anything?
765 2013-06-27 12:30:17 <TD> like, some people want the ability to run bitbanks with it and it doesn't work that well for this
766 2013-06-27 12:30:18 <BW^-> to me spontaneously that sounds good
767 2013-06-27 12:30:19 <michagogo> That's not it
768 2013-06-27 12:30:22 <michagogo> Same error
769 2013-06-27 12:30:32 <BW^-> td: aha, by what reason?
770 2013-06-27 12:30:35 <sipa> createrawtransaction '[{"txid":"a9d4599e15b53f3eb531608ddb31f48c695c3d0b3538a6bda871e8b34f2f430c","vout":0}]' '{"mkZBYBiq6DNoQEKakpMJegyDbw2YiNQnHT":50}'
771 2013-06-27 12:30:41 <sipa> try that style
772 2013-06-27 12:30:41 <michagogo> Oh
773 2013-06-27 12:30:47 <michagogo> The [] is actually supposed to be there?
774 2013-06-27 12:30:48 <TD> they want the ability to manage millions of keys or huge wallets or load and unload wallets, other things that are best done with fully indexed databases of the block chain, etc.
775 2013-06-27 12:31:00 <BW^-> aha
776 2013-06-27 12:31:00 <michagogo> Oops.
777 2013-06-27 12:31:01 <sipa> michagogo: yes, you can have multiple inputs
778 2013-06-27 12:31:03 <TD> with bitcoinj you basically get a wallet that you can send/receive from, and if it gets too big then performance gets very poor.
779 2013-06-27 12:31:06 <sipa> oh, that's probably it then :)
780 2013-06-27 12:31:08 <BW^-> aha i'm completely with you,
781 2013-06-27 12:31:12 <TD> it's not optimised for huge deployments
782 2013-06-27 12:31:18 <BW^-> it's like features and stuff that are simply not there
783 2013-06-27 12:31:19 <BW^-> yep got you
784 2013-06-27 12:31:37 <TD> if you want to create a new blockchain.info then, well, people have done that.
785 2013-06-27 12:31:41 <TD> but it took some work from their side.
786 2013-06-27 12:31:43 <michagogo> Aha
787 2013-06-27 12:31:48 jchp has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
788 2013-06-27 12:31:49 <TD> e.g. SatoshiDice is built on bitcoinj but they had to customise it quite a bit
789 2013-06-27 12:31:53 <michagogo> So yeah adding '[ and ]' fixed it
790 2013-06-27 12:31:55 <michagogo> Thanks :-D
791 2013-06-27 12:32:10 jchp has joined
792 2013-06-27 12:33:08 <BW^-> td: so basically the fundamentals work very well anyhow, like, getting the chain and performing the basic operations
793 2013-06-27 12:33:16 <BW^-> well gr8 :)
794 2013-06-27 12:33:30 stretchwarren has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
795 2013-06-27 12:33:33 <TD> yeah if you don't want to scale up then it works fine. if you want to build an end-user wallet app, that's what it's optimised for
796 2013-06-27 12:33:36 agnostic98 has joined
797 2013-06-27 12:33:46 <TD> and we're adding features at the moment to make it easy/easier to work with contracts.
798 2013-06-27 12:33:55 <TD> but again, designed for small apps that don't handle a lot of traffic.
799 2013-06-27 12:34:00 <BW^-> aha
800 2013-06-27 12:34:02 <BW^-> td: contracts?
801 2013-06-27 12:34:03 <TD> the best place to ask questions is the mailing list
802 2013-06-27 12:34:08 <TD> https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/wiki/WorkingWithContracts
803 2013-06-27 12:34:15 <BW^-> td: btw, when you run it in "full block chain mode", what kind of RAM consumption characteristics does it have now?
804 2013-06-27 12:34:16 <TD> multi-signature transactions and other things
805 2013-06-27 12:34:29 <michagogo> What would I do if I wanted to mine a block and insert an unbroadcasted transaction I have?
806 2013-06-27 12:34:32 <TD> BW^-: ask BlueMatt, he manages that part of the codebase. but for a "real app" you should be using it in SPV mode connected to a bitcoind you own
807 2013-06-27 12:35:48 rdymac has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
808 2013-06-27 12:37:14 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
809 2013-06-27 12:37:40 <BW^-> td: hm, for my thing i'd prefer fully verifying, so that really all is in bitcoinj
810 2013-06-27 12:38:08 <michagogo> (testnet)
811 2013-06-27 12:38:13 <BlueMatt> BW^-: problem is bitcoinj full verification is still "beta"
812 2013-06-27 12:38:16 <TD> yes, except that as it says on the website and documentation fully verifying mode is *experimental*. you are likely to be exposed to chain splitting bugs if you do that.
813 2013-06-27 12:38:21 <TD> it's not something i'd recommend for production usage.
814 2013-06-27 12:38:32 <gmaxwell> BW^-: running a SPV node behind a full verifying node that you run _is_ full verifying.
815 2013-06-27 12:38:32 <BlueMatt> and there doesnt exist a full verification engine outside of bitcoind that I would trust very much...
816 2013-06-27 12:38:51 <TD> there are no implementations of bitcoin other than the original that i'd trust for handling real money right now. that's why we suggest running it behind a bitcoind
817 2013-06-27 12:38:54 <BW^-> yes i know - i would be running the "full verifying" bitcoinj *behind* a bitcoind that's full verifying already
818 2013-06-27 12:38:58 <gmaxwell> It's just spilting up your server into to partsâ a network speaking validting part, and your application.
819 2013-06-27 12:39:00 <TD> well ...... why.
820 2013-06-27 12:39:03 <BW^-> it's just that i want all the database to be able to access it
821 2013-06-27 12:39:04 <TD> it doesn't add any security. just overhead.
822 2013-06-27 12:39:06 <BlueMatt> there is no reason for that, though...
823 2013-06-27 12:39:21 <TD> what it gives you is access to the UTXO set. not a fully indexed database of the entire chain
824 2013-06-27 12:39:22 <BlueMatt> you can get the same db (and a better one) without running in full verification mode
825 2013-06-27 12:39:26 <gmaxwell> BW^-: thats a way to become DOS vulnerable until the code matures. It may or may not be relevant for your application.
826 2013-06-27 12:39:42 <TD> BW^-: what app are you wanting to write?
827 2013-06-27 12:40:28 <BW^-> i know it doesn't add security - it's having the full UTXO set i was haivng on my mind.
828 2013-06-27 12:40:53 <BW^-> td: currently i want to get the bitcoin system more, in a very mechanic way as to handle it programmatically, and i picture digging into bitcoinj's sources is the best way of doing this
829 2013-06-27 12:41:42 <BW^-> in terms of practicality, to handle some wallets.
830 2013-06-27 12:41:45 [\\\\] has left ()
831 2013-06-27 12:42:02 <BW^-> if i could add an index atop bitcoinj would be great, though i should get the system better first -
832 2013-06-27 12:42:12 <BW^-> the protocol is incredibly simple indeed though i want to see how it plays out in practice.
833 2013-06-27 12:43:40 <BW^-> chain splitting bugs - ouch, so it's at that level.
834 2013-06-27 12:44:51 thrasher` has quit (Changing host)
835 2013-06-27 12:44:51 thrasher` has joined
836 2013-06-27 12:46:43 <TD> ok
837 2013-06-27 12:46:52 <BW^-> td: how would you go about to make a full indexed database today?
838 2013-06-27 12:46:58 <TD> BW^-: i would never describe the bitcoin protocol as "simple", heh
839 2013-06-27 12:47:02 <TD> it might LOOK simple .....
840 2013-06-27 12:47:25 <sipa> the p2p protocol is simple
841 2013-06-27 12:47:29 <TD> BW^-: well indeed i'd extend the H2FullPrunedBlockStore class. H2 is a full sql database so it's much slower than bitcoind which uses leveldb, but it does mean you can add more tables and indexes quite easily
842 2013-06-27 12:47:33 <sipa> the validation rules aren't :)
843 2013-06-27 12:47:55 <TD> BW^-: try talking to alexander lolis. he has already written a block explorer on top of bitcoinj
844 2013-06-27 12:47:57 abrkn has joined
845 2013-06-27 12:48:09 <BW^-> :)
846 2013-06-27 12:48:13 <TD> BW^-: and he learned a lot whilst doing that! i know because i answered his questions, hehe. he hasn't contributed any of his code back yet but he said he would
847 2013-06-27 12:48:21 <TD> i think a fully indexing database was a part of that
848 2013-06-27 12:48:52 <BW^-> td: cool! is he on irc too?
849 2013-06-27 12:49:07 <TD> no. you can email him though. if you sign up the mailing list you can find his posts in the archives
850 2013-06-27 12:49:37 <BW^-> yep cool noted
851 2013-06-27 12:54:00 taha has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
852 2013-06-27 12:56:13 <BW^-> td: can i ask you some Q:s in PM? i'll try to Get It now today :)))
853 2013-06-27 12:56:27 <BW^-> first i have some intro questions just to get that i'm reading the source in the right direction, so to speak
854 2013-06-27 12:56:35 <BW^-> getting the entry points and data flow roughly
855 2013-06-27 12:56:51 <TD> i think we should use this channel unless it gets busy or there's other people wanting to use it, as it's logged so it should be googleable
856 2013-06-27 12:56:58 <BW^-> aha
857 2013-06-27 12:56:59 <BW^-> good
858 2013-06-27 12:57:01 <TD> BW^-: there is an article that explains that
859 2013-06-27 12:57:07 <sipa> there doesn't seem to be any other discussion here now
860 2013-06-27 12:57:13 <TD> BW^-: https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/wiki/HowThingsFitTogether
861 2013-06-27 12:57:46 <BW^-> awesome.
862 2013-06-27 12:58:01 <BW^-> ah btw, Q, Alexis' full chain index, does that use full verifying mode or SPV?
863 2013-06-27 12:58:11 <TD> it's fully verifying too, i think
864 2013-06-27 12:58:24 <TD> actually i'll ping him and see where he got up to
865 2013-06-27 12:59:14 <BlueMatt> payment channels code :D :D https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/source/detail?r=4908c241f7161bc5facfb85b466feba2929f2567
866 2013-06-27 12:59:35 <TD> (micropayment channels that is)
867 2013-06-27 12:59:43 <TD> congrats BlueMatt. Great work!
868 2013-06-27 13:00:34 dan__ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
869 2013-06-27 13:00:37 hnz has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
870 2013-06-27 13:01:09 dan_ has joined
871 2013-06-27 13:01:32 <BlueMatt> TD: hey, you wrote the initial implementation
872 2013-06-27 13:01:53 <TD> yeah and then went on vacation whilst you did all the rest, haha :)
873 2013-06-27 13:01:55 <TD> like a boss
874 2013-06-27 13:02:13 <michagogo> What would I need to do if I wanted to solo-mine a testnet block and include a transaction that hasn't been broadcast to the network?
875 2013-06-27 13:02:36 <TD> michagogo: send it to your own node, then start it mining i guess. or you mean you want to send it to your node and not have it be relayed at all?
876 2013-06-27 13:02:40 MobiusL has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
877 2013-06-27 13:02:50 <TD> michagogo: there's no out of the box way to do that, but you could hack the code so there's a relay blacklist
878 2013-06-27 13:03:11 <TD> BlueMatt: sourceforge is really slow to deliver mail, huh
879 2013-06-27 13:03:20 <BlueMatt> TD: it always is
880 2013-06-27 13:03:54 <michagogo> TD: Is there no mining software that offers that option?
881 2013-06-27 13:04:02 <TD> could be. i don't know much about mining.
882 2013-06-27 13:04:15 <BlueMatt> thats not really up to the miner, thats up to bitcoind...
883 2013-06-27 13:04:20 rdymac has joined
884 2013-06-27 13:04:40 agnostic98 has joined
885 2013-06-27 13:05:26 <BW^-> td: so Alexander Lolis presumes that the full verifying bitcoinj mode works right?
886 2013-06-27 13:05:29 <BW^-> i mean, his project is based on that
887 2013-06-27 13:05:36 <BW^-> as in, does not incur any unintended splits or anything
888 2013-06-27 13:05:37 <BW^-> ?
889 2013-06-27 13:05:38 <michagogo> Does mining software that works without bitcoind not exist?
890 2013-06-27 13:06:08 <BlueMatt> BW^-: its fairly stable, and for a block explorer if it hiccups every once in a while its not a huge deal, but if you are actually doing payments and such on it, its not recommended
891 2013-06-27 13:06:10 <kinlo> michagogo: currently everybody generating blocks uses the satoshi client
892 2013-06-27 13:06:12 <kinlo> hence bitcoind
893 2013-06-27 13:06:36 <michagogo> Wasn't there something about miners being able to insert their own transactions?
894 2013-06-27 13:06:38 <kinlo> michagogo: atm the other implementations of the bitcoin client are just not reliable enough to mine upon afaik
895 2013-06-27 13:06:40 <BlueMatt> michagogo: no, and if you do find some, please ping them and tell them to not do that until they've written an order of magnitude more test-cases to compare their implementation with bitcoind
896 2013-06-27 13:06:40 metabyte has quit ()
897 2013-06-27 13:06:50 <BW^-> bluematt: what kind of memory consumption does it havE?
898 2013-06-27 13:06:51 <BlueMatt> michagogo: yes, but you let bitcoind do the transaction selection
899 2013-06-27 13:07:01 <michagogo> BlueMatt: What do you mean?
900 2013-06-27 13:07:02 <BW^-> i know bitcoind went from like 1.5GB to like couple of hundred MB due to some optimization, a while ago
901 2013-06-27 13:07:14 <kinlo> michagogo: most pools have their bitcoind patched to do all sorts of funky stuff
902 2013-06-27 13:07:29 <kinlo> michagogo: if you want to include special transactions, you probably would go that way too
903 2013-06-27 13:07:31 <TD> BW^-: that was optimising the network code. i don't know what kind of memory usage a fully verifying bitcoinj app has, but it's a fair bet it'll be more than bitcoind
904 2013-06-27 13:07:37 <michagogo> Hmm, are any of those patches public?
905 2013-06-27 13:07:43 <kinlo> michagogo: yes
906 2013-06-27 13:07:44 <BlueMatt> BW^-: its java, so...not great, but since most of the library is designed to fit on constrained android devices, TD has done a good job keeping memory consumption down
907 2013-06-27 13:07:47 <TD> BW^-: reason being, H2 is a full store, and java code tends to be more of a memory piggy by default anyway.
908 2013-06-27 13:08:00 <TD> sorry by "full store" i meant "sql database"
909 2013-06-27 13:08:01 <michagogo> kinlo: (where can they be found?)
910 2013-06-27 13:08:08 <TD> man, a lot of words are getting mangled between brain and keyboard today
911 2013-06-27 13:08:19 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
912 2013-06-27 13:08:24 <kinlo> michagogo: I'd have to look
913 2013-06-27 13:08:29 <BlueMatt> michagogo: many miners (hopefully going to) use the getblocktemplate rpc call to allow miners to select their own transactions, but those miners use bitcoind to do the selection....its really a thing for pools
914 2013-06-27 13:08:30 <kinlo> michagogo: what do you want to do?
915 2013-06-27 13:08:32 wallet43 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
916 2013-06-27 13:08:38 hnz has joined
917 2013-06-27 13:08:52 <kinlo> michagogo: you would *need* a pool to do anything related
918 2013-06-27 13:09:23 <michagogo> kinlo: At the moment, mine a testnet block that contains a transaction that I have that is not broadcast until the block is released
919 2013-06-27 13:09:52 <kinlo> michagogo: so simply patch the bitcoind not to broadcast transactions...
920 2013-06-27 13:10:00 <kinlo> that shouldn't be too hard if you know a bit of C++
921 2013-06-27 13:10:06 <michagogo> Which I don't :-/
922 2013-06-27 13:10:34 yubrew has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
923 2013-06-27 13:10:37 freewil has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
924 2013-06-27 13:10:53 <michagogo> Meh, g2g for now... bbl.
925 2013-06-27 13:11:06 sark2 has joined
926 2013-06-27 13:13:35 Dyaheon has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
927 2013-06-27 13:13:58 sark has quit (!~sark@37-252-106-157.ip.skylogicnet.com|Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
928 2013-06-27 13:18:33 wumpus has quit (No Ping reply in 180 seconds.)
929 2013-06-27 13:18:48 wumpus has joined
930 2013-06-27 13:18:48 <TD> i'm not aware of such a thing, but i don't know how H2 works internally
931 2013-06-27 13:18:48 wumpus has joined
932 2013-06-27 13:18:51 ahf has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
933 2013-06-27 13:18:54 Dyaheon has joined
934 2013-06-27 13:18:56 <BlueMatt> BW^-: no, it has to hold a large lookup table
935 2013-06-27 13:19:15 <BW^-> bluematt: it does or does not have to hold a large lookup table?
936 2013-06-27 13:19:22 <BlueMatt> but it can freely be on disk
937 2013-06-27 13:19:28 <BW^-> does not, aha
938 2013-06-27 13:19:29 starsoccer has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
939 2013-06-27 13:19:38 <BlueMatt> it has to have it, but it can be in an sql store on disk
940 2013-06-27 13:19:44 <BW^-> super
941 2013-06-27 13:19:55 <BW^-> does that have a Huge impact on performance, or why does BitcoinD choose to keep it in RMA?
942 2013-06-27 13:19:56 <BW^-> RAM
943 2013-06-27 13:20:12 <TD> bitcoind does not hold it in RAM. it may *cache* it in RAM, mind you
944 2013-06-27 13:20:15 <TD> unless you're thinking of the headers
945 2013-06-27 13:20:16 <BW^-> for code simplicity only? i mean, you sacrifice lots of usecases by requiring 500MB+ RAM for an app
946 2013-06-27 13:20:28 <BW^-> bitcoind 0.7 took like 1.5GB
947 2013-06-27 13:20:35 <BlueMatt> no, that was network cluge
948 2013-06-27 13:20:38 <BW^-> TD: not sure
949 2013-06-27 13:20:39 <BlueMatt> not anything required
950 2013-06-27 13:20:41 <BW^-> wow really
951 2013-06-27 13:20:41 _milone has joined
952 2013-06-27 13:20:44 <BlueMatt> its network code was bad...
953 2013-06-27 13:20:48 <BW^-> incredible. aha thank you for highlighting this.
954 2013-06-27 13:20:50 <sipa> git head should be able to run with close to 500 MiB
955 2013-06-27 13:20:59 <TD> it's much better in the latest versions
956 2013-06-27 13:21:03 <TD> and yes it was networking code
957 2013-06-27 13:21:11 JyZyXEL has joined
958 2013-06-27 13:21:11 <BlueMatt> well, mostly
959 2013-06-27 13:21:19 <BlueMatt> also mempool, but the network stuff was...
960 2013-06-27 13:21:47 stretchwarren has joined
961 2013-06-27 13:21:51 starsoccer has joined
962 2013-06-27 13:21:54 ahf has joined
963 2013-06-27 13:22:49 <runeks> Does anyone know if Bitpay has anyway to see what their USD exchange rate for bitcoins is?
964 2013-06-27 13:23:14 <runeks> I mean, if *I* have any way to see what Bitpay's current BTCUSD exchange rate is...
965 2013-06-27 13:23:22 <runeks> jgarzik?
966 2013-06-27 13:24:15 <BW^-> td: what do you base your tendency to recommend bitcoind for serious stuff when in full verification today - is it that another node implementation such as yours, needs to *mimic bitcoind specifics* as not to cause a chain split locally , or simply like funamental logics bugs in BitcoinJ, that there is some error in how it handles the protocol spec?
967 2013-06-27 13:24:28 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
968 2013-06-27 13:24:48 <TD> the former
969 2013-06-27 13:24:53 <BW^-> really
970 2013-06-27 13:24:54 <BW^-> hm
971 2013-06-27 13:25:00 <TD> there are no chain splitting bugs that we know if in bitcoinj (except that it does not implement block version 2)
972 2013-06-27 13:25:12 <TD> however we are pretty sure there are some chain splitting bugs in there we don't know about!
973 2013-06-27 13:25:37 <BW^-> td: so when someday you realize there is one, you'll learn to know this quite quickly because everyone will be buzzing you about it, and fix it? =)
974 2013-06-27 13:25:50 <BW^-> generally with a one-line patch i'd guess?
975 2013-06-27 13:26:09 freewil has joined
976 2013-06-27 13:26:19 <TD> well, we don't really know how many users there are. but yes we've had bug reports of chain splits before.
977 2013-06-27 13:26:21 <TD> so clearly some people do.
978 2013-06-27 13:26:39 agricocb has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
979 2013-06-27 13:28:04 <BW^-> ok
980 2013-06-27 13:29:16 rdymac has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
981 2013-06-27 13:30:14 freewil has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
982 2013-06-27 13:31:31 <BW^-> td: what about block version 2 support?
983 2013-06-27 13:32:02 <TD> it'd be a nice contribution if you want to do it. it basically means checking the height is in the coinbase input script at the right location. not very hard.
984 2013-06-27 13:33:08 <gmaxwell> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/179435 :-/
985 2013-06-27 13:33:25 <BW^-> td: so it's not about bitcoinj using an older spec or format version and could be considered outdated at some point because of that or anything like that?
986 2013-06-27 13:33:25 <gmaxwell> checking those commit IDs it seems like freebsd is shipping random non-release commits of bitcoin.
987 2013-06-27 13:34:13 <TD> we should write some code that checks an ELF signature and prints a bigass warning if you're not using upstream builds
988 2013-06-27 13:34:20 Subo1978 has joined
989 2013-06-27 13:36:18 <gmaxwell> I wish the boost test frameworked differently so that you could realistically make (some of?) your unit tests part of the dist binary so you can do tests on install or startup.
990 2013-06-27 13:37:40 Subo1978_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
991 2013-06-27 13:39:45 <TD> the problem of course, is that they'd just patch out any checks we added to discourage use of downstream binaries
992 2013-06-27 13:39:53 MobiusL has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat)
993 2013-06-27 13:40:01 <TD> we should maybe have a file in the source tree explaining the issues inherent in distributor repackaging (and/or a website page)
994 2013-06-27 13:41:30 anarchy5 has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
995 2013-06-27 13:44:58 patcon has joined
996 2013-06-27 13:45:37 agricocb has joined
997 2013-06-27 13:47:24 <gmaxwell> TD: People don't believe them / don't care.
998 2013-06-27 13:48:03 <gmaxwell> And if you try to impress on them the nuance they just claim we're incompent.
999 2013-06-27 13:48:28 agricocb has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1000 2013-06-27 13:48:29 <TD> i know. i've dealt with idiot downstreams before. doesn't matter, the people who need to see the arguments are the end users, not distributors
1001 2013-06-27 13:49:09 agricocb has joined
1002 2013-06-27 13:49:32 Guest59311 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1003 2013-06-27 13:49:41 stretchwarren has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1004 2013-06-27 13:49:44 reneg has joined
1005 2013-06-27 13:49:53 reneg is now known as Guest61131
1006 2013-06-27 13:50:14 <gmaxwell> At least tests wouldn't get patched out, and we could _catch_ some amounts of crap breaking out from under us. Making them patch out a warning would also at least make it clear where the blame lies when it blows up people (see how debian took all the flak and openssl took none when debian patched out freeking undefined behavior incorrectly and even sent the patches to an openssl mailing list, and broke the rng)
1007 2013-06-27 13:50:37 milone_ has joined
1008 2013-06-27 13:51:31 JZavala has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1009 2013-06-27 13:52:59 <BW^-> TD: the version 1/2 thing is that the one spoken about on http://mineforeman.com/2013/03/19/version-1-bitcoin-blocks-will-soon-be-orphaned/ ?
1010 2013-06-27 13:53:37 OneFixt has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1011 2013-06-27 13:53:38 <TD> probably, guessing from the url :)
1012 2013-06-27 13:53:59 <BW^-> aha
1013 2013-06-27 13:54:05 <BW^-> td: do you have any plans on going version 2?
1014 2013-06-27 13:54:27 <BW^-> i mean, how big of an update is needed for it?
1015 2013-06-27 13:54:46 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
1016 2013-06-27 13:55:02 <TD> it's not a big change and we have no plans to do that soon. we're working on other things
1017 2013-06-27 13:55:04 <BlueMatt> no, its quite a small update
1018 2013-06-27 13:55:20 aa has joined
1019 2013-06-27 13:55:40 Subo1978_ has joined
1020 2013-06-27 13:55:51 aa is now known as MobiusL
1021 2013-06-27 13:56:24 <BW^-> ok cool
1022 2013-06-27 13:58:54 Subo1978__ has joined
1023 2013-06-27 13:59:00 Subo1978 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1024 2013-06-27 14:00:28 hookercookerman has joined
1025 2013-06-27 14:00:32 Odyessus has joined
1026 2013-06-27 14:01:16 Guest83631 has joined
1027 2013-06-27 14:01:17 porquilho has joined
1028 2013-06-27 14:02:20 Subo1978_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1029 2013-06-27 14:02:59 Odyessus_ has joined
1030 2013-06-27 14:03:14 Subo1978 has joined
1031 2013-06-27 14:05:30 Odyessus has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1032 2013-06-27 14:05:34 Subo1978_ has joined
1033 2013-06-27 14:06:40 Subo1978__ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1034 2013-06-27 14:08:23 chorao has joined
1035 2013-06-27 14:08:23 chorao has quit (Changing host)
1036 2013-06-27 14:08:23 chorao has joined
1037 2013-06-27 14:09:00 Subo1978 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1038 2013-06-27 14:09:49 <BW^-> TD: will you make a -sources.jar file of latest bitcoinj? there's for 0.8 til now
1039 2013-06-27 14:09:56 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1040 2013-06-27 14:11:20 Subo1978_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1041 2013-06-27 14:12:04 <BW^-> bluematt: the channels, what is the practical utility there, that you create a transaction of X BTC and can then easily regulate what Y% of it should actually be considered committed?
1042 2013-06-27 14:13:01 <BlueMatt> sort of, yes
1043 2013-06-27 14:13:29 <BlueMatt> you commit X BTC then incrementally increase the Y% as you need more
1044 2013-06-27 14:13:42 <BlueMatt> useful for paying for anything that is pay-as-you-go
1045 2013-06-27 14:14:04 <BlueMatt> remove ads on the internet? open payment channel to ad server, pay fractions of bitcents per ad and they go away
1046 2013-06-27 14:14:15 Subo1978 has joined
1047 2013-06-27 14:14:21 <BlueMatt> need to buy cell minutes? incrementally pay fractions of bitcents per minute
1048 2013-06-27 14:15:34 hookercookerman has quit (Quit: Page closed)
1049 2013-06-27 14:17:36 michagogo has joined
1050 2013-06-27 14:20:01 Odyessus_ has quit (Quit: Colloquy for iPad - http://colloquy.mobi)
1051 2013-06-27 14:21:26 patcon has joined
1052 2013-06-27 14:21:45 patcon has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1053 2013-06-27 14:21:54 patcon has joined
1054 2013-06-27 14:22:41 stretchwarren has joined
1055 2013-06-27 14:23:17 <gmaxwell> I can't find this "94933c3" that freebsd claims to be shipping anywhere. It's not googling, its not reflog on my checkouts.
1056 2013-06-27 14:23:33 cc_8 has joined
1057 2013-06-27 14:25:58 [\\\]_o has joined
1058 2013-06-27 14:25:59 <TD> BW^-: no. the right way to get bitcoinj is install git, clone the repo and then run the command in my announcement emails. this way you have some guarantee of source integrity.
1059 2013-06-27 14:25:59 [\\\] has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1060 2013-06-27 14:26:05 <BW^-> bluematt: great. how do you do that technically, without clogging the blockchain with all these increments?
1061 2013-06-27 14:26:08 <TD> BW^-: of course it's best if you verify the signatures on my emails too
1062 2013-06-27 14:26:18 <TD> BW^-: please refer to the documentation for how it works. it's all explained there.
1063 2013-06-27 14:26:41 <BlueMatt> gmaxwell: some private copy with their patches?
1064 2013-06-27 14:27:14 <BlueMatt> BW^-: thats the point, the increments dont go in the blockchain
1065 2013-06-27 14:27:40 <TD> BW^-: so alexanders code for the block explorer is actually not integrated with bitcoinj, he built on top of it in clojure and built up the database contents himself.
1066 2013-06-27 14:28:06 <BW^-> td: what's the documentaiton URL with the GIT URL and other instructions for being up to date with the source?
1067 2013-06-27 14:28:20 <TD> see the "Using bitcoinj with Maven" article on the website
1068 2013-06-27 14:28:28 <TD> (there's a theme developing here..... ;)
1069 2013-06-27 14:28:33 daybyter has joined
1070 2013-06-27 14:28:42 <gmaxwell> BlueMatt: in IRC logs the freebsd packager seems to be claiming to have gotten that hash from github: http://bitcoinstats.com/irc/bitcoin-dev/logs/2013/06/09#l7616758
1071 2013-06-27 14:29:07 <TD> man in the middle!
1072 2013-06-27 14:29:53 <sipa> *that* explains why they're so insisting on using SF...
1073 2013-06-27 14:30:13 <BW^-> td: warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout.
1074 2013-06-27 14:30:13 <BW^-> hm
1075 2013-06-27 14:30:23 <TD> what command did you run?
1076 2013-06-27 14:30:30 <BW^-> git clone https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/bitcoinj
1077 2013-06-27 14:30:35 <BW^-> git version 1.5.6
1078 2013-06-27 14:30:38 <BW^-> aha too old maybe
1079 2013-06-27 14:30:52 <TD> no
1080 2013-06-27 14:30:57 <TD> there's a space in the command that you dropped
1081 2013-06-27 14:31:04 <TD> look at the instructions carefully or copy/paste
1082 2013-06-27 14:31:10 <TD> git clone https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/ bitcoinj
1083 2013-06-27 14:31:11 <BW^-> td: i did, it gave the same then!
1084 2013-06-27 14:31:14 <gmaxwell> sipa: do you have a 94933c3 in your reflog output?
1085 2013-06-27 14:31:19 skinnkavaj has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
1086 2013-06-27 14:31:23 <TD> see the space before the last bitcoinj?
1087 2013-06-27 14:31:26 <BlueMatt> gmaxwell/sipa: for some reason I remember the folder name which github serves up in their tars to not actually be a git commit
1088 2013-06-27 14:31:30 <BlueMatt> (despite looking like one)
1089 2013-06-27 14:31:33 <BW^-> td: yes, i tried it first. it has the same effect:
1090 2013-06-27 14:31:37 <BW^-> $ git clone https://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/ bitcoinj
1091 2013-06-27 14:31:39 <BW^-> Initialize bitcoinj/.git
1092 2013-06-27 14:31:44 <BW^-> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/user/bitcoinj/.git/
1093 2013-06-27 14:31:47 <BW^-> warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout.
1094 2013-06-27 14:31:53 <gmaxwell> BlueMatt: any idea what it is?
1095 2013-06-27 14:32:17 <BlueMatt> hmm, git show 94933c3 shows a signed 0.8.2 tag
1096 2013-06-27 14:32:28 <BlueMatt> didnt verify, but looks ok?
1097 2013-06-27 14:32:29 <Luke-Jr> ^
1098 2013-06-27 14:32:29 <gmaxwell> BlueMatt: ah so I bet he originally wrote that port from just looking at the git history and then it didn't work... because the field isn't really the comment, its the path used inside the tar?
1099 2013-06-27 14:32:35 <TD> huh
1100 2013-06-27 14:32:38 <TD> let me try
1101 2013-06-27 14:32:45 skinnkavaj has joined
1102 2013-06-27 14:32:45 skinnkavaj has quit (Changing host)
1103 2013-06-27 14:32:45 skinnkavaj has joined
1104 2013-06-27 14:32:48 <gmaxwell> oh it's the signature and I never pulled the signed tags?
1105 2013-06-27 14:32:54 <BW^-> td: sure, if it works for you i should just update git
1106 2013-06-27 14:32:57 <BlueMatt> no idea, but I see it
1107 2013-06-27 14:33:16 <TD> BW^-: yeah it worked for me .... try updating git indeed
1108 2013-06-27 14:33:19 <gmaxwell> well that makes perfect sense.
1109 2013-06-27 14:33:22 <BlueMatt> so, yes, the folder name is not the name of the commit which was tagged, but the tag itself
1110 2013-06-27 14:33:23 <TD> i have version 1.8.3
1111 2013-06-27 14:34:20 <BW^-> td: is there any alternative GIT repo URL? like, ssh- or git:// based?
1112 2013-06-27 14:34:31 <TD> no. but that one should work.
1113 2013-06-27 14:34:44 <sipa> gmaxwell: yes, as v0.8.2
1114 2013-06-27 14:36:22 Eiii has joined
1115 2013-06-27 14:36:22 Eiii has quit (Changing host)
1116 2013-06-27 14:36:22 Eiii has joined
1117 2013-06-27 14:36:46 agnostic98 has joined
1118 2013-06-27 14:37:17 HM_ has left ()
1119 2013-06-27 14:38:50 bnc_do_chorao_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1120 2013-06-27 14:40:03 RazielXYZ has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
1121 2013-06-27 14:40:41 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1122 2013-06-27 14:41:13 <BW^-> td: you mentioned something like that doing a full block chain index in bitcoinj's fully verifying mode would be fine while you don't recommend using it to do transactions - would the potential issue here only be if there's bugs causing a chain split?
1123 2013-06-27 14:41:31 <BW^-> i mean, with at least 90% probability the issue would be
1124 2013-06-27 14:42:19 <TD> well, yeah.
1125 2013-06-27 14:42:22 rdymac has joined
1126 2013-06-27 14:42:26 <TD> i suppose we could support indexing without verification
1127 2013-06-27 14:42:31 <TD> but it's not supported today
1128 2013-06-27 14:42:35 egis has joined
1129 2013-06-27 14:42:45 fishfish has joined
1130 2013-06-27 14:42:48 <sipa> it'd be nice to be able to have a maintained/queryable UTXO set without doing verification
1131 2013-06-27 14:42:48 arthurb_ has joined
1132 2013-06-27 14:45:31 ericmuyser has joined
1133 2013-06-27 14:46:03 roconnor has joined
1134 2013-06-27 14:46:10 kwikness has joined
1135 2013-06-27 14:46:20 justusranvier has joined
1136 2013-06-27 14:46:34 <helo> if someone (a competing miner?) publishes proof that a utxo root in a block is invalid, then the block is invalid?
1137 2013-06-27 14:46:56 <michagogo> How many hashes on average does it take to find a testnet block?
1138 2013-06-27 14:47:16 <sipa> michagogo: 2^32 * difficulty
1139 2013-06-27 14:47:27 <michagogo> Also: are they coming out on average every 10 minutes?
1140 2013-06-27 14:47:30 <sipa> yes
1141 2013-06-27 14:47:37 <michagogo> What's the current difficulty?
1142 2013-06-27 14:48:33 <michagogo> ;;calc 2^32*240.48507088
1143 2013-06-27 14:48:34 <gribble> Error: Something in there wasn't a valid number.
1144 2013-06-27 14:48:40 <michagogo> What?
1145 2013-06-27 14:48:48 <michagogo> ;;calc 2**32*240.48507088
1146 2013-06-27 14:48:48 <gribble> 1.03287551461e+12
1147 2013-06-27 14:49:20 sacredchao has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1148 2013-06-27 14:49:41 <michagogo> So just over a terahash
1149 2013-06-27 14:50:37 _milone has joined
1150 2013-06-27 14:50:55 taha has joined
1151 2013-06-27 14:51:38 sacredchao has joined
1152 2013-06-27 14:51:51 <BlueMatt> use regtest mode
1153 2013-06-27 14:52:27 Subo1978_ has joined
1154 2013-06-27 14:53:37 rdymac has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1155 2013-06-27 14:54:14 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1156 2013-06-27 14:54:44 nowan has joined
1157 2013-06-27 14:56:00 Subo1978 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1158 2013-06-27 14:56:01 <TD> interesting. it looks like the blockchain.info android app now supports SPV mode as well, toggleable by the user
1159 2013-06-27 14:56:11 <BW^-> td: upgrading GIT worked, gr8!
1160 2013-06-27 14:56:15 <TD> sweet
1161 2013-06-27 14:56:24 <BlueMatt> TD: wonder if they reimplemented all the crap to do it themselves...
1162 2013-06-27 14:56:28 <BlueMatt> or bop of bitcoinj
1163 2013-06-27 14:56:53 <TD> it's on top of bitcoinj
1164 2013-06-27 14:57:01 <BlueMatt> ahh, nice
1165 2013-06-27 14:57:04 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1166 2013-06-27 14:57:09 <TD> it basically has a global isInP2PFallbackMode() that splits between using their API and using bitcoinj
1167 2013-06-27 14:57:23 <TD> they give a speed warning when it starts saying it'll take a long time to sync, which is odd.
1168 2013-06-27 14:57:35 <TD> because it's not actually slow anymore. but i guess he isn't doing the sync at night trick
1169 2013-06-27 14:58:02 <michagogo> ;;gentime 25 240.48507088
1170 2013-06-27 14:58:03 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 25.0 Mhps, given difficulty of 240.48507088, is 11 hours, 28 minutes, and 35 seconds
1171 2013-06-27 14:58:20 <TD> and maybe he's not using checkpoints. anyway ....
1172 2013-06-27 14:59:10 Subo1978 has joined
1173 2013-06-27 15:00:09 <BW^-> td,bluematt: how was the development of bitcoinj until now - what were major challenges?
1174 2013-06-27 15:00:17 <TD> it's >2.5 years of work
1175 2013-06-27 15:00:38 <BlueMatt> its essentially TD, I wrote most of the full verification stuff
1176 2013-06-27 15:00:40 <TD> most of the challenge has been killing off all the edge case bugs and making it fast. nobody did SPV mode except us, so we had to extend the bitcoin protocol
1177 2013-06-27 15:00:46 <BlueMatt> and there have been various other contributors
1178 2013-06-27 15:00:50 <TD> which BlueMatt did a lot of work on
1179 2013-06-27 15:00:55 Subo1978__ has joined
1180 2013-06-27 15:01:00 <BW^-> cool
1181 2013-06-27 15:01:15 <BW^-> how many man-months do you believe you have given to it in total?
1182 2013-06-27 15:01:18 <BW^-> just to get an idea
1183 2013-06-27 15:01:27 <BW^-> i mean, this says something important about the level of complexity of the matter
1184 2013-06-27 15:01:48 <BW^-> 43klocs is very fair considering what kind of program it is
1185 2013-06-27 15:01:54 HM2 has joined
1186 2013-06-27 15:02:05 <BW^-> still in the readable zone, that's awesome
1187 2013-06-27 15:02:13 <BW^-> and key
1188 2013-06-27 15:03:00 Subo1978_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1189 2013-06-27 15:03:31 <HM2> Does anyone know what Crypto++'s CascadeMultiply function actually does? Takes 2 EC Points and 2 Ints by const&, returns a point. the code behind it is quite lengthy
1190 2013-06-27 15:03:59 <sipa> HM2: I assume n1*P1 + n2*P2
1191 2013-06-27 15:04:19 <sipa> (which can be done faster than two separate multiplication + an addition)
1192 2013-06-27 15:04:20 Subo1978 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1193 2013-06-27 15:04:25 <HM2> Ah, that makes sense
1194 2013-06-27 15:04:56 RazielZ has joined
1195 2013-06-27 15:05:20 <BW^-> td: ^ that was for you :))
1196 2013-06-27 15:05:40 milone_ has joined
1197 2013-06-27 15:05:44 <TD> probably a few years in total
1198 2013-06-27 15:06:18 <HM2> thanks sipa, i was thrown off. it looks like the double-and-add logic has been inlined in to that routine, probably to take advantage of the optimised method
1199 2013-06-27 15:06:22 <michagogo> Oh
1200 2013-06-27 15:06:26 <BW^-> wow cool.
1201 2013-06-27 15:06:48 <michagogo> ;;gentime 25 120.24253544
1202 2013-06-27 15:06:48 <gribble> The average time to generate a block at 25.0 Mhps, given difficulty of 120.24253544, is 5 hours, 44 minutes, and 17 seconds
1203 2013-06-27 15:07:49 agnostic98 has joined
1204 2013-06-27 15:08:23 <TD> elqnt.org is an interesting approach
1205 2013-06-27 15:09:16 [\\\]_o is now known as [\\\]
1206 2013-06-27 15:09:28 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1207 2013-06-27 15:09:38 ll has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1208 2013-06-27 15:11:24 ll has joined
1209 2013-06-27 15:11:42 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1210 2013-06-27 15:12:31 <michagogo> Does anyone know of any patches for bitcoin that disable the relaying of transactions?
1211 2013-06-27 15:13:14 <sipa> just put a "return;" in net.cpp's RelayTransaction :)
1212 2013-06-27 15:13:43 <HM2> TD: I dunno, it's certainly nicer for global users, but it's easier locally to input a town or zip code to find local parties.
1213 2013-06-27 15:14:01 <TD> yeah. i meant, abusing webrtc to build a p2p app in the browser is interesting
1214 2013-06-27 15:14:11 <TD> you still have the issue that updates aren't really controlled and it's chrome/firefox only of course
1215 2013-06-27 15:14:18 <TD> might as well just write a desktop app at some point
1216 2013-06-27 15:14:55 <michagogo> sipa: It looks like there are 2 of them
1217 2013-06-27 15:14:55 <HM2> So there's no server side db of exchangers?
1218 2013-06-27 15:15:07 <TD> apparently not. i'm not sure how it works
1219 2013-06-27 15:15:15 Subo1978 has joined
1220 2013-06-27 15:15:29 dstien has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
1221 2013-06-27 15:15:37 <HM2> Doing the region joins in a p2p fashion would complicate matters
1222 2013-06-27 15:15:40 Subo1978__ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1223 2013-06-27 15:20:57 <michagogo> sipa: Which one? Or both?
1224 2013-06-27 15:21:25 nomailing has quit (Quit: nomailing)
1225 2013-06-27 15:22:09 tcatm has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
1226 2013-06-27 15:25:24 tcatm has joined
1227 2013-06-27 15:25:27 tcatm has quit (Changing host)
1228 2013-06-27 15:25:27 tcatm has joined
1229 2013-06-27 15:25:30 dstien has joined
1230 2013-06-27 15:26:08 <sipa> michagogo: which one?
1231 2013-06-27 15:26:12 daybyter has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
1232 2013-06-27 15:26:16 <sipa> ah, one forwards to the other
1233 2013-06-27 15:26:33 <michagogo> BTW, how does that work? Having two functions with the same name?
1234 2013-06-27 15:26:40 <forrestv> are bitcoin protocol implementations supposed to ignore trailing data in the payload of messages?
1235 2013-06-27 15:27:08 <sipa> forrestv: yes
1236 2013-06-27 15:27:09 <forrestv> (assuming yes because of the new fRelay stuff, but i'd never read that in any specification)
1237 2013-06-27 15:27:22 gavinandresen has joined
1238 2013-06-27 15:27:22 gavinandresen has quit (Changing host)
1239 2013-06-27 15:27:22 gavinandresen has joined
1240 2013-06-27 15:28:11 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
1241 2013-06-27 15:29:49 <michagogo> sipa: So, which one?
1242 2013-06-27 15:30:03 rdymac has joined
1243 2013-06-27 15:30:03 rdymac has quit (Changing host)
1244 2013-06-27 15:30:03 rdymac has joined
1245 2013-06-27 15:30:15 <michagogo> Also, why are there 2?
1246 2013-06-27 15:34:28 swulf--2 has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
1247 2013-06-27 15:35:02 <HM2> sipa, how's your ultra optimised EC library coming?
1248 2013-06-27 15:35:27 justusranvier has joined
1249 2013-06-27 15:35:38 Clown has joined
1250 2013-06-27 15:36:02 Clown is now known as Guest89887
1251 2013-06-27 15:36:42 tcatm has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1252 2013-06-27 15:37:23 has quit (Clown|!Clown@unaffiliated/clown/x-0272709|Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1253 2013-06-27 15:38:10 tcatm has joined
1254 2013-06-27 15:38:41 Subo1978_ has joined
1255 2013-06-27 15:38:49 dstien has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
1256 2013-06-27 15:39:20 Subo1978 has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1257 2013-06-27 15:39:57 <gavinandresen> HM2: are you asking just because you're curious, or are you running into a situation where speed of ECC is the bottleneck?
1258 2013-06-27 15:41:53 <HM2> curiousity
1259 2013-06-27 15:46:34 tholenst has joined
1260 2013-06-27 15:47:54 A2501 has joined
1261 2013-06-27 15:49:42 A2501 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1262 2013-06-27 15:50:37 A2501 has joined
1263 2013-06-27 15:53:01 <imd23> hey
1264 2013-06-27 15:53:17 <imd23> can someone help me explaining the escrow contract ?
1265 2013-06-27 15:53:18 <imd23> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts#Example_2%3a_Escrow_and_dispute_mediation
1266 2013-06-27 15:53:22 <imd23> I don't get it :(
1267 2013-06-27 15:54:08 <TD> sure, what's the issue
1268 2013-06-27 15:55:12 fishfish has quit (Quit: Bye!)
1269 2013-06-27 15:55:52 phma has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
1270 2013-06-27 15:57:07 dstien has joined
1271 2013-06-27 15:58:25 patcon has joined
1272 2013-06-27 15:58:46 <imd23> TD: awesome. 1) is it currently possible to use it in the network 2) what's this for "The merchant challenges the mediator with a random nonce" ?
1273 2013-06-27 15:59:06 Scrat has quit (Quit: WeeChat 0.4.0)
1274 2013-06-27 15:59:12 agnostic98 has joined
1275 2013-06-27 15:59:15 <TD> yes, the 2-of-3 multisig script is whitelisted
1276 2013-06-27 15:59:25 <TD> it's to make sure that the mediator owns the key the client claims it does
1277 2013-06-27 15:59:31 Scrat has joined
1278 2013-06-27 15:59:48 jMyles has joined
1279 2013-06-27 16:00:00 <michagogo> I'm trying to follow https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-msw.md
1280 2013-06-27 16:00:19 taha has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1281 2013-06-27 16:00:59 jgarzik has joined
1282 2013-06-27 16:01:01 <michagogo> But getting an error: http://pastebin.com/cKTscWDB
1283 2013-06-27 16:01:13 <jgarzik> mornin'
1284 2013-06-27 16:02:03 t7 has quit (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.90 [Firefox 22.0/20130618035212])
1285 2013-06-27 16:02:11 <michagogo> (fresh MinGW/MSYS installation)
1286 2013-06-27 16:03:56 <imd23> TD: can you elaborate how does this work? I still don't get it I don't know why
1287 2013-06-27 16:04:45 <jgarzik> td, BlueMatt: the micropayment channels demo is very cool stuff
1288 2013-06-27 16:04:55 <jgarzik> I'll have to reimplement it in a language I like
1289 2013-06-27 16:04:56 * jgarzik runs
1290 2013-06-27 16:05:02 <TD> or compile it to a language you like
1291 2013-06-27 16:05:05 <TD> (not C)
1292 2013-06-27 16:05:07 <TD> (nobody likes C)
1293 2013-06-27 16:05:31 <HM2> imd23, the mediator has to prove it's who both parties think it is, otherwise one party could pose as the mediator and gain access to the funds
1294 2013-06-27 16:05:48 <TD> imd23: yeah it's a step required for security, to stop the buyer screwing the seller
1295 2013-06-27 16:05:56 <HM2> it's a bit like a certificate chain but less fancy
1296 2013-06-27 16:06:02 <TD> jgarzik: i'm trying to resurrect the native compilation stuff so bcj is usable from C++
1297 2013-06-27 16:06:15 <TD> jgarzik: unfortunately gcj isn't that great .... some serious black magic is required to make it work :(
1298 2013-06-27 16:06:58 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1299 2013-06-27 16:08:06 <jgarzik> TD, indeed. More seriously, I poked a lot with Java, many years ago. Worked at a company that produced TowerJ, then the fastest static Java compiler in existence. Spent lots of time looking at gcj code at the time. Worked on the Kaffe codebase (remember that?) a decade ago, too.
1300 2013-06-27 16:08:38 <TD> i never heard of TowerJ but i always thought java should have emphasised static compilation
1301 2013-06-27 16:09:01 <TD> JIT compilers are one of those ideas that never seemed to work out that well .... but then i guess all the fancy reflection and code synthesis tricks kids these days like wouldn't work
1302 2013-06-27 16:10:04 A2501 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1303 2013-06-27 16:10:09 <jgarzik> TD, anybody doing server side Java seriously used TowerJ :) Performed metric tons of analysis, once the whole scope of the classbase (the set of classes one compiled entity will need) is known. Many more optimizations than gcj. Java works great statically compiled. Even had JNI interface working and other fun.
1304 2013-06-27 16:10:34 <TD> yeah, i am not expecting any performance improvements. i'm just interested in CNI
1305 2013-06-27 16:10:42 <TD> it's the Right Way(tm) to do integration with native code, imo
1306 2013-06-27 16:10:50 <TD> JNI is very neutral and portable but rather unpleasant to use
1307 2013-06-27 16:10:51 <jgarzik> indeed
1308 2013-06-27 16:11:06 <imd23> TD HM2: cool, thanks for explaining me that, and about the cryptographically part, I don't get that too. How does it cryptographically happen
1309 2013-06-27 16:11:23 BW^- has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1310 2013-06-27 16:11:32 <TD> imd23: a nonce is a random number, literally a number-used-once. so the server invents a random number and sends it to the mediator, and the mediator calculates a digital signature and returns it
1311 2013-06-27 16:11:38 <TD> the seller checks it and it passes
1312 2013-06-27 16:11:49 <TD> now the seller knows the mediator owns the private key corresponding to the public key that the client is wanting to use
1313 2013-06-27 16:12:17 <TD> so it can be secure in knowing that everything is as it should be
1314 2013-06-27 16:12:23 <TD> the random number is just so the mediator has something to sign
1315 2013-06-27 16:14:03 <HM2> the mediator shouldn't use the key for anything else
1316 2013-06-27 16:14:14 <HM2> otherwise you could potentially have it sign anything
1317 2013-06-27 16:14:20 <michagogo> I can't seem to get https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-msw.md to work
1318 2013-06-27 16:14:26 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
1319 2013-06-27 16:14:42 <michagogo> I got the OpenSSL part to work, but all the other parts are failing
1320 2013-06-27 16:14:47 <michagogo> (the prereqs, that is)
1321 2013-06-27 16:15:36 denisx has joined
1322 2013-06-27 16:16:16 sgstair has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1323 2013-06-27 16:16:16 sgstair has joined
1324 2013-06-27 16:16:30 <denisx> good news for germans, bitcoins are taxfree if you had them longer than a year
1325 2013-06-27 16:16:35 <denisx> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Bundestag-Bitcoinverkaeufe-nach-Haltefrist-steuerfrei-1897814.html
1326 2013-06-27 16:16:40 kanyl has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1327 2013-06-27 16:16:55 Sidnicious has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1328 2013-06-27 16:16:57 bitinstant has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1329 2013-06-27 16:16:57 <denisx> the article is only in german, sorry
1330 2013-06-27 16:17:11 TheLordOfTime has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1331 2013-06-27 16:17:15 bitinstant has joined
1332 2013-06-27 16:17:18 amiller_ has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1333 2013-06-27 16:17:24 <jMyles> Anybody else trying to use the makemigrations command in 1.6? It fails if a field has a lazy verbose name.
1334 2013-06-27 16:17:28 c_k has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1335 2013-06-27 16:17:42 poop_ has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1336 2013-06-27 16:17:49 poop_ has joined
1337 2013-06-27 16:18:40 guruvan has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1338 2013-06-27 16:20:19 amiller_ has joined
1339 2013-06-27 16:20:36 guruvan has joined
1340 2013-06-27 16:21:10 A2501 has joined
1341 2013-06-27 16:21:17 dan_ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1342 2013-06-27 16:21:32 justusranvier has joined
1343 2013-06-27 16:22:19 jgarzik has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1344 2013-06-27 16:23:58 Sidnicious has joined
1345 2013-06-27 16:24:04 c_k has joined
1346 2013-06-27 16:24:10 TheLordOfTime has joined
1347 2013-06-27 16:24:32 patcon has joined
1348 2013-06-27 16:25:22 ericmuyser has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1349 2013-06-27 16:25:50 ericmuyser has joined
1350 2013-06-27 16:26:24 TD is now known as TD[gone]
1351 2013-06-27 16:26:27 ericmuyser has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1352 2013-06-27 16:26:42 ericmuyser has joined
1353 2013-06-27 16:28:18 Neozonz has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1354 2013-06-27 16:29:05 <imd23> TD & HM2 Thank you! you guys rock
1355 2013-06-27 16:30:15 <lianj> denisx: nice its kinda validated now, but was known for some time already
1356 2013-06-27 16:30:50 <denisx> lianj: I never heard of it before, but nice it is
1357 2013-06-27 16:30:54 dan_ has joined
1358 2013-06-27 16:30:59 kanyl has joined
1359 2013-06-27 16:30:59 kanyl has quit (Changing host)
1360 2013-06-27 16:30:59 kanyl has joined
1361 2013-06-27 16:31:29 dan_ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1362 2013-06-27 16:31:35 ericmuyser has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1363 2013-06-27 16:35:15 BW^- has joined
1364 2013-06-27 16:35:41 _milone has joined
1365 2013-06-27 16:35:45 <BW^-> td: around?
1366 2013-06-27 16:36:14 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1367 2013-06-27 16:37:31 Internet13 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1368 2013-06-27 16:37:36 bnc_do_chorao_ has joined
1369 2013-06-27 16:38:25 jgarzik has joined
1370 2013-06-27 16:38:25 jgarzik has quit (Changing host)
1371 2013-06-27 16:38:25 jgarzik has joined
1372 2013-06-27 16:39:36 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1373 2013-06-27 16:40:54 Toresh has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
1374 2013-06-27 16:43:11 Toresh has joined
1375 2013-06-27 16:43:13 Internet13 has joined
1376 2013-06-27 16:46:14 sark2 has quit (!~sark@37-252-106-157.ip.skylogicnet.com|Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1377 2013-06-27 16:47:13 sark2 has joined
1378 2013-06-27 16:48:00 <sipa> HM2: haven't had time for it recently, but soon i will
1379 2013-06-27 16:49:14 <sipa> michagogo: one calls the other, read about function overloading
1380 2013-06-27 16:49:24 <sipa> michagogo: change the one which is the lowest
1381 2013-06-27 16:49:32 <sipa> michagogo: i.e, the one which is called by the other
1382 2013-06-27 16:49:34 <michagogo> So, the second, longer one?
1383 2013-06-27 16:49:49 <sipa> don't know the order, but likely the longer one yes
1384 2013-06-27 16:50:04 <michagogo> Also, I fear the point may be moot because I can't figure out how to build it
1385 2013-06-27 16:50:13 <sipa> that's a first step :D
1386 2013-06-27 16:50:31 <sipa> which OS, and bitcoind or bitcoin-qt?
1387 2013-06-27 16:52:56 patcon has joined
1388 2013-06-27 16:53:08 <HM2> sipa, i see asm commits, looks very clean and polished now.
1389 2013-06-27 16:53:10 Diapolis has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1390 2013-06-27 16:53:53 Diapolis has joined
1391 2013-06-27 16:53:59 fanquake has left ()
1392 2013-06-27 16:54:12 <sipa> HM2: there's an experimental 5x64 field implementation, but it can't beat 5x52 anywhere, it seems
1393 2013-06-27 16:54:16 daybyter has joined
1394 2013-06-27 16:55:24 <michagogo> sipa: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-msw.md
1395 2013-06-27 16:55:42 <michagogo> I installed MinGW, and the openssl step seems to have worked
1396 2013-06-27 16:55:49 <michagogo> But none of the other prereqs are building
1397 2013-06-27 16:56:04 <sipa> if you need to build on windows, i hope you have a few hours/days to figure everything out
1398 2013-06-27 16:56:26 <sipa> for me, it'd certainly be faster to install a linux distro and then do a cross-compile to windows
1399 2013-06-27 16:56:42 <sipa> (but there are people who do native windows builds)
1400 2013-06-27 16:56:43 <michagogo> It's just a pain to reboot into Ubuntu
1401 2013-06-27 16:56:44 brson has joined
1402 2013-06-27 16:57:25 <sipa> note that i haven't used windows as a main OS for 12 years now, so i may be slightly biased
1403 2013-06-27 16:57:28 <HM2> sipa, what you want is an built in benchmark that can swap them out dynamically
1404 2013-06-27 16:57:39 <sipa> HM2: too complex
1405 2013-06-27 16:57:43 <HM2> :P
1406 2013-06-27 16:57:57 <michagogo> Hm, I remember that there was a reason that I couldn't use an Ubuntu VM to build
1407 2013-06-27 16:58:00 <sipa> and also not worth it, it can be decided at compile time which is faster
1408 2013-06-27 16:58:05 <michagogo> But I don't remember what that reason was
1409 2013-06-27 16:58:39 <sipa> in any case, can't help you for windows builds
1410 2013-06-27 16:59:19 <michagogo> Oh, wait a minute.
1411 2013-06-27 16:59:21 * michagogo facepalms
1412 2013-06-27 16:59:34 <michagogo> The reason I couldn't use a VM was because that was for gitian building
1413 2013-06-27 16:59:44 DoctorBTC is now known as Crontaur_
1414 2013-06-27 16:59:44 <michagogo> And gitian building happens within a VM
1415 2013-06-27 17:00:03 Crontaur_ is now known as DoctorBTC
1416 2013-06-27 17:01:31 <HM2> sipa, perhaps on some platforms you can make it more automatic. GCC supports the target function attribute, for instance, that lets you swap out function versions at compile time based on CPU features like sse4.2 etc
1417 2013-06-27 17:02:19 <HM2> of course that'd require figuring out on what CPUs one field impl is faster than the other
1418 2013-06-27 17:02:24 <sipa> HM2: it mostly depends on configuration... things like do you have yasm, which optimization level, is it x86_64, ...
1419 2013-06-27 17:02:35 <sipa> using gmp or openssl
1420 2013-06-27 17:04:12 <sipa> but right now, the question is mostly whether there is any platform where an optimal build of 5x52 is slower than an optimal build of 5x64
1421 2013-06-27 17:04:18 <sipa> if not, i can drop 5x64 entirely
1422 2013-06-27 17:04:27 <sipa> much less maintenance work
1423 2013-06-27 17:04:42 <gmaxwell> HM2: thats just a nusance compared to doing normal RTCD and having a table of function pointers. :P
1424 2013-06-27 17:04:51 rawdr has joined
1425 2013-06-27 17:05:03 <HM2> sure, but as long as you're not dispatching through a fp in a hot loop you're fine
1426 2013-06-27 17:05:19 <gmaxwell> how do you think the GCC support works? ...
1427 2013-06-27 17:05:25 <gmaxwell> (which, incidentally, is C++ only)
1428 2013-06-27 17:05:50 <HM2> actually i just read that the target attribute isn't what i said, it changes -march on a per-function basis
1429 2013-06-27 17:06:14 <HM2> i was thinking of the __builtin runtime checks for cpu detection they introduced recently
1430 2013-06-27 17:06:22 <HM2> you still have to do dispatch yourself, sadly
1431 2013-06-27 17:07:56 <gmaxwell> nah, they have C++ only dispatching stuff but, meh.
1432 2013-06-27 17:08:44 rdymac has quit (Quit: Saliendo)
1433 2013-06-27 17:09:28 <gmaxwell> __attribute__ ((target ("sse4.2")))
1434 2013-06-27 17:09:43 <HM2> I don't know why the linker couldn't handle it for C. I guess you'd lose portability
1435 2013-06-27 17:10:01 <sipa> my guess is that it's not the linker that resolves it
1436 2013-06-27 17:10:22 <sipa> but you get different mangled symbol names, and they are resolved by the compiler?
1437 2013-06-27 17:10:22 <gmaxwell> I'd assumed it was, I haven't looked.
1438 2013-06-27 17:11:41 <gmaxwell> sipa: you're right.
1439 2013-06-27 17:12:25 <gmaxwell> It inserts a stub that checks and then dispatches.
1440 2013-06-27 17:12:57 <HM2> that makes no sense
1441 2013-06-27 17:13:41 <HM2> " It is up to the user to make sure that a function is only invoked on a machine that supports the particular ISA it is compiled for"
1442 2013-06-27 17:14:16 <gmaxwell> HM2: I assume thats wrt your arch flag pragmas?
1443 2013-06-27 17:15:54 <gmaxwell> for something small like sipas code, it would be pretty reasonable to just compile it N ways and let the linker resolve it. At least on linux there is linker support for switching out whole shared libraries based on arch.
1444 2013-06-27 17:16:23 egis has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1445 2013-06-27 17:17:34 bbbrian has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1446 2013-06-27 17:17:55 ericmuyser has joined
1447 2013-06-27 17:23:34 testnode9_ has joined
1448 2013-06-27 17:23:57 Diapolis has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1449 2013-06-27 17:23:58 walch has joined
1450 2013-06-27 17:24:57 free499__ has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1451 2013-06-27 17:26:01 <HM2> there's no runtime cpu detection with the target attribute, or additional mangling
1452 2013-06-27 17:28:06 agricocb has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1453 2013-06-27 17:28:50 <gmaxwell> HM2: uh.
1454 2013-06-27 17:28:59 <gmaxwell> HM2: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning
1455 2013-06-27 17:29:14 A2501 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1456 2013-06-27 17:30:06 reneg has joined
1457 2013-06-27 17:30:12 agricocb has joined
1458 2013-06-27 17:30:33 reneg is now known as Guest5801
1459 2013-06-27 17:31:06 <HM2> hmm
1460 2013-06-27 17:31:18 reneg_ has joined
1461 2013-06-27 17:31:49 <michagogo> sipa: Is there a doc somewhere for cross-compiling for Windows on Ubuntu?
1462 2013-06-27 17:32:05 reneg__ has joined
1463 2013-06-27 17:32:18 peetaur2 has joined
1464 2013-06-27 17:32:43 <HM2> gmaxwell, ah
1465 2013-06-27 17:32:59 <gmaxwell> (though I dunno why I'm lecturing you on a feature I think isn't terribly useful!)
1466 2013-06-27 17:33:00 Guest61131 has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1467 2013-06-27 17:33:04 <HM2> gmaxwell, it only works when you add the target attribute to *all* functions
1468 2013-06-27 17:33:46 <HM2> (with the same sig)
1469 2013-06-27 17:34:59 Guest5801 has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
1470 2013-06-27 17:36:40 reneg_ has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
1471 2013-06-27 17:37:23 <HM2> yeah it's not terribly useful for x86_64 code, since all x64 support up to SSE2 (?) anyway
1472 2013-06-27 17:38:08 <HM2> useful for -m32 code for sure though
1473 2013-06-27 17:39:16 <michagogo> Is there a document somewhere with instructions for using Ubuntu to compile bitcoind for Windows?
1474 2013-06-27 17:41:14 A2501 has joined
1475 2013-06-27 17:43:06 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1476 2013-06-27 17:43:43 btcquant has joined
1477 2013-06-27 17:43:52 A2501 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1478 2013-06-27 17:44:40 A2501 has joined
1479 2013-06-27 17:45:02 <gmaxwell> HM2: nah, they went ahead and fragmented x86_64 almost as soon as it was done, SSE3/SSE4/SSE4.2/AVX/AVX2. plus a bunch of intel vs amd fine distinguishing bits.
1480 2013-06-27 17:45:40 viperhr has quit (Read error: No route to host)
1481 2013-06-27 17:45:59 viperhr has joined
1482 2013-06-27 17:46:19 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
1483 2013-06-27 17:52:20 rawdr has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1484 2013-06-27 17:52:42 rawdr has joined
1485 2013-06-27 17:52:54 rawdr has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1486 2013-06-27 17:53:12 justusranvier has joined
1487 2013-06-27 17:53:28 freewil has joined
1488 2013-06-27 17:54:22 rawdr has joined
1489 2013-06-27 17:54:50 <BW^-> bluematt: around?
1490 2013-06-27 17:55:01 patcon has joined
1491 2013-06-27 17:55:41 rawdr has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1492 2013-06-27 17:55:56 rawdr has joined
1493 2013-06-27 17:57:05 <HM2> gmaxwell, so why don't you think it's terribly useful?
1494 2013-06-27 17:59:29 reneg_ has joined
1495 2013-06-27 17:59:33 mrkent has joined
1496 2013-06-27 18:00:18 reneg__ has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1497 2013-06-27 18:00:31 mrkent has quit (Max SendQ exceeded)
1498 2013-06-27 18:00:56 mrkent has joined
1499 2013-06-27 18:02:35 mrkent has quit (Max SendQ exceeded)
1500 2013-06-27 18:03:52 <nsh> ;;seen petertodd
1501 2013-06-27 18:03:53 <gribble> petertodd was last seen in #bitcoin-dev 2 days, 5 hours, 39 minutes, and 30 seconds ago: <petertodd> gmaxwell: shit, actually that's just a gossip network where fraud messages are propagated too all cliques... someone will make one of those one day
1502 2013-06-27 18:04:13 daybyter has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
1503 2013-06-27 18:05:43 milone_ has joined
1504 2013-06-27 18:07:35 Subo1978 has joined
1505 2013-06-27 18:08:07 FredEE has joined
1506 2013-06-27 18:08:48 MobiusL has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1507 2013-06-27 18:09:08 <michagogo> Does a set of instructions exist for using Ubuntu to cross-compile bitcoind for Windows?
1508 2013-06-27 18:09:53 MobiusL has joined
1509 2013-06-27 18:10:28 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
1510 2013-06-27 18:10:40 Subo1978_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1511 2013-06-27 18:13:41 <nsh> 1. Good luck.
1512 2013-06-27 18:13:54 <nsh> (no idea, sorry)
1513 2013-06-27 18:14:12 <nsh> discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=203749.0
1514 2013-06-27 18:14:27 bbbrian has joined
1515 2013-06-27 18:14:34 <nsh> last post recommends using gitian, which is the long form of "Good luck."
1516 2013-06-27 18:16:13 <michagogo> nsh: I'm able to build in gitian if I get out my external harddrive
1517 2013-06-27 18:16:32 <michagogo> But I don't actually know anything about how it works or how to change things
1518 2013-06-27 18:16:33 <nsh> can you not do it in a loopback device or something?
1519 2013-06-27 18:16:46 * nsh has not even looked at gitian, just observed a lot of complaints :)
1520 2013-06-27 18:16:50 <michagogo> I'd like to figure out how to build in a VM
1521 2013-06-27 18:17:04 <nsh> right, i recall a discussion to that end
1522 2013-06-27 18:17:12 <michagogo> And I can't use gitian in a VM because it uses a VM itself
1523 2013-06-27 18:17:26 <michagogo> Meaning it needs hardware virtualization
1524 2013-06-27 18:17:36 <nsh> hardware virtualization can be simulated, i'd assume
1525 2013-06-27 18:17:54 <nsh> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_machine#Emulation_of_the_underlying_raw_hardware_.28native_execution.29
1526 2013-06-27 18:17:58 <nsh> nope
1527 2013-06-27 18:18:33 <nsh> hmm, maybe it's not been done
1528 2013-06-27 18:19:09 <devrandom> michagogo: it's possible in principle to have recursive virtualization
1529 2013-06-27 18:19:11 mrkent has joined
1530 2013-06-27 18:19:11 mrkent has quit (Changing host)
1531 2013-06-27 18:19:11 mrkent has joined
1532 2013-06-27 18:19:27 <michagogo> devrandom: I'm told it would be extremely slow
1533 2013-06-27 18:19:31 <devrandom> Luke-Jr might know details
1534 2013-06-27 18:19:35 <devrandom> not necessarily
1535 2013-06-27 18:19:52 <devrandom> I believe some CPUs support fully accelerated recursive VMs
1536 2013-06-27 18:20:11 <michagogo> Is the Intel Core i7-3610QM one of those?
1537 2013-06-27 18:20:12 <devrandom> another thing you can do is LXC Gitian within a VM
1538 2013-06-27 18:20:16 <devrandom> I don't know
1539 2013-06-27 18:20:29 viperhr has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
1540 2013-06-27 18:20:40 _milone has joined
1541 2013-06-27 18:20:58 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: fully accelerated recursive VMs is still pretty slow
1542 2013-06-27 18:21:01 mollison has joined
1543 2013-06-27 18:21:06 <Luke-Jr> obviously it could be slower, but still
1544 2013-06-27 18:21:42 <devrandom> is it more like 2x, or 100x?
1545 2013-06-27 18:22:17 <Luke-Jr> I'd say 25x
1546 2013-06-27 18:22:42 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
1547 2013-06-27 18:22:57 <michagogo> ^C01[2013-05-23 20:55:13] <michagogo> If I understand this correctly, gitian externally manages a VM that it runs, correct?
1548 2013-06-27 18:22:57 <michagogo> ^C01[2013-05-23 20:55:32] <michagogo> So the system you run gitian on needs virtualization support?
1549 2013-06-27 18:22:57 <michagogo> [2013-05-23 20:55:59] <gavinandresen> michagogo: yes, otherwise it is beastly slow
1550 2013-06-27 18:23:29 <michagogo> ^C01[2013-05-23 20:58:13] <michagogo> gavinandresen: How slow is "beastly slow"?
1551 2013-06-27 18:23:29 <michagogo> [2013-05-23 20:59:16] <gavinandresen> michagogo: uhhh⦠a day to complete a build beastly-slowâ¦.
1552 2013-06-27 18:24:21 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1553 2013-06-27 18:24:35 <devrandom> michagogo: so how about using LXC? that doesn't require any virtualization support
1554 2013-06-27 18:24:58 <Luke-Jr> michagogo: that's without hw accel
1555 2013-06-27 18:24:58 <michagogo> LXC?
1556 2013-06-27 18:25:27 stalled has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
1557 2013-06-27 18:25:31 <devrandom> grep for LXC in the gitian-tools source
1558 2013-06-27 18:25:43 <Luke-Jr> I'm pretty sure anything i7 has hw accel virt
1559 2013-06-27 18:26:21 <devrandom> michagogo: running LXC inside a VM should be full speed
1560 2013-06-27 18:26:25 Diapolis has joined
1561 2013-06-27 18:26:37 <devrandom> you probably want the VM to be a recent Ubuntu
1562 2013-06-27 18:27:02 <devrandom> Luke-Jr: did you guys have any issues with LXC?
1563 2013-06-27 18:27:21 Krellan has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1564 2013-06-27 18:27:23 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: I'm too scared to try LXC <.<
1565 2013-06-27 18:27:31 <Luke-Jr> it still seems too immature
1566 2013-06-27 18:27:53 altamic has joined
1567 2013-06-27 18:28:02 <devrandom> I haven't run into any issues
1568 2013-06-27 18:28:07 altamic has left ()
1569 2013-06-27 18:28:09 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: but you're using Ubuntu
1570 2013-06-27 18:28:14 <devrandom> although the tor people had some non-determinism due to hostname and such
1571 2013-06-27 18:29:13 <michagogo> Luke-Jr: Right, but I thought Virtualbox doesn't emulate hardware virtualization support
1572 2013-06-27 18:29:45 justusranvier has joined
1573 2013-06-27 18:30:04 <devrandom> michagogo: LXC is a lightweight "container", that actually runs in the same address space as the host, so it doesn't require HW support
1574 2013-06-27 18:30:12 <devrandom> it should run fine inside a Virtualbox Ubuntu instance
1575 2013-06-27 18:31:14 <gavinandresen> LXC builds were non-deterministic for me when I tried them⦠oh, 6 or 8 months ago
1576 2013-06-27 18:31:47 <devrandom> I see
1577 2013-06-27 18:31:56 tholenst has quit (Quit: Page closed)
1578 2013-06-27 18:32:07 agnostic98 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1579 2013-06-27 18:32:07 <gavinandresen> if you don't care about determinism (just want to cross-compile) then LXC would probably work great
1580 2013-06-27 18:33:29 <devrandom> gavinandresen: would it be useful if I tracked down the non-determinism issue?
1581 2013-06-27 18:34:06 btsec has joined
1582 2013-06-27 18:34:08 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1583 2013-06-27 18:34:14 <gavinandresen> devrandom: sure, but only mildly useful-- KVM and VirtualBox are working nicely
1584 2013-06-27 18:34:39 <devrandom> OK
1585 2013-06-27 18:34:48 brson has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1586 2013-06-27 18:35:07 reneg_ has quit (Quit: -a- Connection Timed Out)
1587 2013-06-27 18:35:35 <nsh> it seems this deterministic-build problem is more thorny than i had naively apprehended
1588 2013-06-27 18:35:51 <Luke-Jr> michagogo: are you using Windows or Mac or something? Why Virtualbox?
1589 2013-06-27 18:35:54 <runeks> With regards to micro-payments channels, is there any mechanism that prevents the client from double spending the coins? Like finishing the encounter by sending out a new transactions that sends all the coins back to himself by providing a transaction with a higher fee?
1590 2013-06-27 18:35:56 reneg has joined
1591 2013-06-27 18:36:02 <michagogo> Luke-Jr: I'm using Windows
1592 2013-06-27 18:36:03 <devrandom> nsh: the Tor people spent 6 weeks to get the tor bundle deterministic
1593 2013-06-27 18:36:18 <devrandom> with firefox etc
1594 2013-06-27 18:36:19 reneg is now known as Guest83277
1595 2013-06-27 18:36:20 <nsh> yeah, they're not exactly PHP coders either
1596 2013-06-27 18:36:25 <devrandom> right
1597 2013-06-27 18:36:57 <devrandom> but I think once we collect some wisdom about non-determinism sources, things can be smoother for other packages
1598 2013-06-27 18:37:03 * nsh nods
1599 2013-06-27 18:37:23 <michagogo> Luke-Jr: My goal is to figure out how to mine a testnet block, while including a transaction that's been kept off of the network
1600 2013-06-27 18:37:43 <nsh> interesting michagogo... to what end?
1601 2013-06-27 18:37:47 <michagogo> In other words, not broadcasting it at all until it's been part of a block
1602 2013-06-27 18:37:56 <michagogo> nsh: Idk, just an interesting challenge
1603 2013-06-27 18:38:07 <nsh> right
1604 2013-06-27 18:38:25 <michagogo> Luke-Jr: sipa says I should modify bitcoin, putting return; in RelayTransaction in net.cpp
1605 2013-06-27 18:38:34 <sipa> you don't have to!
1606 2013-06-27 18:38:34 brson has joined
1607 2013-06-27 18:38:35 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: tbh, I'm inclined to (if I had time) hack Gentoo so it's 100% deterministic <.<
1608 2013-06-27 18:38:36 <michagogo> That means figuring out how to build.
1609 2013-06-27 18:38:42 <michagogo> sipa: How ele could I do it?
1610 2013-06-27 18:38:44 <sipa> but you asked how to not relay transactions
1611 2013-06-27 18:38:52 <sipa> ... also, why the hell do you want that?
1612 2013-06-27 18:38:57 btcquant has quit (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com)
1613 2013-06-27 18:39:06 <michagogo> sipa: I'm trying to figure out how to get it done
1614 2013-06-27 18:39:11 <michagogo> No real reason, just a challenge
1615 2013-06-27 18:39:14 <sipa> ok
1616 2013-06-27 18:39:22 paracyst has joined
1617 2013-06-27 18:40:17 <michagogo> sipa: I mean, is there a better I can mine a non-broadcasted transaction besides figuring out how to make a non-relaying bitcoind?
1618 2013-06-27 18:40:25 <devrandom> Luke-Jr: that would be great, if you want to distribute binaries, but since Gentoo is a source distro, only the bootstrap needs to be deterministic, right?
1619 2013-06-27 18:40:30 <michagogo> better way*
1620 2013-06-27 18:40:47 stalled has joined
1621 2013-06-27 18:42:01 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: Gentoo optionally builds binaries for everything it compiles
1622 2013-06-27 18:42:15 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: my goal would be to do p2p verified compiling
1623 2013-06-27 18:42:33 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: so each object would be compared for N trusted signatures or something
1624 2013-06-27 18:42:58 <nsh> Luke-Jr, i think we need to kidnap Eli Ben-Sasson for a few weeks of intense interrogation
1625 2013-06-27 18:43:06 <devrandom> Luke-Jr: so people sometimes get binaries instead of compile from source?
1626 2013-06-27 18:43:07 <nsh> i'm game if you are, but i don't really have a spare-room
1627 2013-06-27 18:43:27 <devrandom> I'm tempted to switch to Gentoo for the source-build feature
1628 2013-06-27 18:43:38 <devrandom> seems much easier to start from a clean slate
1629 2013-06-27 18:43:43 <Luke-Jr> nsh: that might be a good gitian killer :p
1630 2013-06-27 18:43:47 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: right
1631 2013-06-27 18:44:06 <Luke-Jr> devrandom: after a few people build in your web of trust, you'd just use their binaries
1632 2013-06-27 18:44:20 <devrandom> got it
1633 2013-06-27 18:44:25 <Luke-Jr> unless you change a compile flag, then you'd rebuild the files affected or something
1634 2013-06-27 18:46:38 <devrandom> Luke-Jr: I'd be interested in collaborating on that
1635 2013-06-27 18:47:19 <devrandom> it would be nice it if fell back automatically as needed to source compilation
1636 2013-06-27 18:47:56 owowo has joined
1637 2013-06-27 18:48:00 <Luke-Jr> well, it's not very high near the top of my todo list :/
1638 2013-06-27 18:48:27 <devrandom> OK
1639 2013-06-27 18:49:14 <michagogo> Is there a way to do what gitian does without a VM?
1640 2013-06-27 18:49:30 mappum has joined
1641 2013-06-27 18:49:37 <michagogo> (the building part, not the determinism part)
1642 2013-06-27 18:50:00 <devrandom> whatever it does in the build script, you could run on the host
1643 2013-06-27 18:50:25 <devrandom> assuming it was compatible with the build VM OS
1644 2013-06-27 18:51:50 <sipa> michagogo: submit a pullrequest that changes this, poke BlueMatt that he fixes pulltester, and download the pulltester output :D
1645 2013-06-27 18:52:22 <michagogo> sipa: o_O
1646 2013-06-27 18:52:38 iddo has quit (Changing host)
1647 2013-06-27 18:52:38 iddo has joined
1648 2013-06-27 18:52:40 <michagogo> Does it build for Windows?
1649 2013-06-27 18:52:48 <sipa> yes
1650 2013-06-27 18:52:55 <michagogo> Oooo...kay.....
1651 2013-06-27 18:53:25 <michagogo> ;;later tell BlueMatt Any idea if pulltester will be working any time soon?
1652 2013-06-27 18:53:26 <gribble> The operation succeeded.
1653 2013-06-27 19:01:20 jgarzik_ has joined
1654 2013-06-27 19:01:26 <sipa> hello realname
1655 2013-06-27 19:01:47 mE\Ta has joined
1656 2013-06-27 19:03:57 jgarzik has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1657 2013-06-27 19:04:52 A2501 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1658 2013-06-27 19:05:19 andyh2 has joined
1659 2013-06-27 19:10:26 xire has joined
1660 2013-06-27 19:10:27 xire has quit (Changing host)
1661 2013-06-27 19:10:27 xire has joined
1662 2013-06-27 19:12:26 dan_ has joined
1663 2013-06-27 19:13:41 viperhr has joined
1664 2013-06-27 19:14:50 <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: doesn't bitcoinj do validation now?
1665 2013-06-27 19:25:41 jgarzik_ has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
1666 2013-06-27 19:27:03 <sipa> Luke-Jr: yes it can do validation (it maintains a utxo set and verifies scripts), but some parts are missing (v2 blocks for example) and it doesn't have a mempool
1667 2013-06-27 19:27:40 <Luke-Jr> sounds enough to do simple relaying
1668 2013-06-27 19:28:17 <sipa> only for blocks
1669 2013-06-27 19:28:19 <sipa> but yes
1670 2013-06-27 19:28:19 <nsh> sipa, are v2 blocks described in a BIP?
1671 2013-06-27 19:28:24 <sipa> bip34 iirc
1672 2013-06-27 19:28:28 <nsh> right, ty
1673 2013-06-27 19:28:52 <sipa> then again, i'm not sure about the benefit
1674 2013-06-27 19:29:14 <nsh> picked-from-bottom percentage rules considered nonoptimal
1675 2013-06-27 19:29:24 <sipa> ?
1676 2013-06-27 19:29:29 <Luke-Jr> sipa: relaying transactions only needs a mempool, which is trivial
1677 2013-06-27 19:29:37 <nsh> 3. 75% rule: // 4. 95% rule
1678 2013-06-27 19:29:46 <nsh> ( https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0034 )
1679 2013-06-27 19:29:53 denisx has quit (Quit: denisx)
1680 2013-06-27 19:29:55 <sipa> ok
1681 2013-06-27 19:30:04 <sipa> suggestions?
1682 2013-06-27 19:30:49 <nsh> whenever i suggest things the eschaton is immanentized
1683 2013-06-27 19:30:53 <nsh> so i'll duck out
1684 2013-06-27 19:31:00 <sipa> haha
1685 2013-06-27 19:32:59 <nsh> sipa, makes more sense reading gavin's pull note: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/1526
1686 2013-06-27 19:33:43 <nsh> probably there's no escaping picking semiarbitrary and somewhat humany numbers like this
1687 2013-06-27 19:34:29 <nsh> it's network transition logic, hmm
1688 2013-06-27 19:35:01 patcon has joined
1689 2013-06-27 19:36:07 MobPhone has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1690 2013-06-27 19:38:22 toffoo has joined
1691 2013-06-27 19:38:49 <michagogo> ;;calc 16**2
1692 2013-06-27 19:38:50 <gribble> 256
1693 2013-06-27 19:38:58 <michagogo> ;;calc 2**16
1694 2013-06-27 19:38:59 <gribble> 65536
1695 2013-06-27 19:46:26 MobPhone has joined
1696 2013-06-27 19:46:30 mE\Ta has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1697 2013-06-27 19:47:11 andyh2 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1698 2013-06-27 19:50:37 milone_ has joined
1699 2013-06-27 19:51:44 Chat1544 has joined
1700 2013-06-27 19:51:56 Chat1544 has quit (Client Quit)
1701 2013-06-27 19:54:24 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1702 2013-06-27 19:55:12 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
1703 2013-06-27 19:55:19 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1704 2013-06-27 19:59:20 cc_8 has quit ()
1705 2013-06-27 20:02:24 justusranvier has joined
1706 2013-06-27 20:02:35 agnostic98 has joined
1707 2013-06-27 20:05:39 _milone has joined
1708 2013-06-27 20:06:42 easy-iPad has joined
1709 2013-06-27 20:09:46 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
1710 2013-06-27 20:10:37 btcquant has joined
1711 2013-06-27 20:12:34 RazielZ has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
1712 2013-06-27 20:13:05 kwikness has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1713 2013-06-27 20:13:36 RazielZ has joined
1714 2013-06-27 20:15:07 kwikness has joined
1715 2013-06-27 20:20:40 milone_ has joined
1716 2013-06-27 20:21:17 Guest20326 is now known as zerogravity
1717 2013-06-27 20:21:22 patcon has joined
1718 2013-06-27 20:23:01 jevin has quit (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com)
1719 2013-06-27 20:24:10 toffoo has quit ()
1720 2013-06-27 20:24:38 kwikness has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
1721 2013-06-27 20:24:40 _milone has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1722 2013-06-27 20:33:44 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1723 2013-06-27 20:37:33 grau has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1724 2013-06-27 20:38:34 xire has quit (Ping timeout: 264 seconds)
1725 2013-06-27 20:40:51 Jackneill has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1726 2013-06-27 20:40:58 robocoin_ is now known as robocoin
1727 2013-06-27 20:41:08 grau has joined
1728 2013-06-27 20:42:53 Insti has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1729 2013-06-27 20:45:33 agnostic98 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1730 2013-06-27 20:45:41 agnostic98 has joined
1731 2013-06-27 20:48:16 gritball has joined
1732 2013-06-27 20:49:28 Insti has joined
1733 2013-06-27 20:50:02 grau has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1734 2013-06-27 20:50:40 _milone has joined
1735 2013-06-27 20:51:28 davout has joined
1736 2013-06-27 20:51:28 davout has quit (Changing host)
1737 2013-06-27 20:51:28 davout has joined
1738 2013-06-27 20:52:22 grau has joined
1739 2013-06-27 20:53:57 _milone has quit (Client Quit)
1740 2013-06-27 20:54:02 RoboTeddy has joined
1741 2013-06-27 20:54:17 milone_ has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
1742 2013-06-27 20:54:27 milone has joined
1743 2013-06-27 21:02:58 grau has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1744 2013-06-27 21:02:58 easy-iPad has quit (Quit: Outta here?)
1745 2013-06-27 21:06:03 impulse has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1746 2013-06-27 21:06:20 patcon has joined
1747 2013-06-27 21:09:01 impulse has joined
1748 2013-06-27 21:09:16 jgarzik_ has joined
1749 2013-06-27 21:10:04 jgarzik_ has quit (Changing host)
1750 2013-06-27 21:10:04 jgarzik_ has joined
1751 2013-06-27 21:10:08 jgarzik_ is now known as jgarzik
1752 2013-06-27 21:11:09 Thepok has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1753 2013-06-27 21:11:32 peetaur2 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
1754 2013-06-27 21:12:13 coingenuity has quit (Quit: ZNC - http://znc.in)
1755 2013-06-27 21:13:11 <skinnkavaj> BlueMatt: Are you the one Mike Hearn is talking about? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=244656.0
1756 2013-06-27 21:15:29 <nsh> Matt Corallo in Launchpad
1757 2013-06-27 21:15:30 <nsh> https://launchpad.net/~bluemattâ
1758 2013-06-27 21:15:30 <nsh> Matt Corallo. Overview; Code · Bugs ... Launchpad Id: bluematt. Email: Log in for email ... IRC: BlueMatt on irc.freenode.net. OpenPGP keys: 43E08E54.
1759 2013-06-27 21:15:45 <nsh> conclusion: yes
1760 2013-06-27 21:15:53 <nsh> source: simple googling :)
1761 2013-06-27 21:15:57 <jgarzik> skinnkavaj, yes he is
1762 2013-06-27 21:17:09 viperhr has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
1763 2013-06-27 21:18:48 <nsh> micopayment channels sounds interesting->potentially_great
1764 2013-06-27 21:18:58 <jgarzik> yep
1765 2013-06-27 21:19:19 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1766 2013-06-27 21:19:40 <nsh> "So who wants to create a pay as much as you use music streaming service? Micropayments for each second of listening. Goes straight to artist."
1767 2013-06-27 21:19:49 <nsh> sounds like a summer-project :)
1768 2013-06-27 21:19:54 <nsh> s/-/ /
1769 2013-06-27 21:20:33 <nsh> also good would be integrating stuff like Flattr into bitcoin
1770 2013-06-27 21:20:35 <nsh> to ease adoption
1771 2013-06-27 21:24:29 RazielZ has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1772 2013-06-27 21:25:38 A2501 has joined
1773 2013-06-27 21:28:46 Dragonsangel has joined
1774 2013-06-27 21:28:47 BurtyBB has joined
1775 2013-06-27 21:33:01 BurtyB has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1776 2013-06-27 21:35:19 patcon has joined
1777 2013-06-27 21:35:37 agricocb has quit (Quit: Leaving.)
1778 2013-06-27 21:35:40 <dan_> I downloaded testnet-in-a-box but can't get it to mine. Is that expected? getgenerate==true and gethashespersec==0
1779 2013-06-27 21:35:49 ThomasV has joined
1780 2013-06-27 21:38:19 andyh2 has joined
1781 2013-06-27 21:47:36 wamatt_ has joined
1782 2013-06-27 21:48:17 wamatt has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1783 2013-06-27 21:48:32 wamatt_ has quit (Client Quit)
1784 2013-06-27 21:50:42 milone_ has joined
1785 2013-06-27 21:52:42 fewerlaws has joined
1786 2013-06-27 21:55:22 milone has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
1787 2013-06-27 21:55:26 Dragonsangel has quit (Quit: Page closed)
1788 2013-06-27 21:56:35 <BW^-> what handshake is there in the protocol?
1789 2013-06-27 21:56:52 <BW^-> before it starts to share broadcasts with the connector. none?
1790 2013-06-27 21:58:30 agricocb has joined
1791 2013-06-27 21:58:38 <sipa> "connector" ?
1792 2013-06-27 21:58:45 jevin has joined
1793 2013-06-27 22:01:19 Liquid3xB has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1794 2013-06-27 22:03:17 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1795 2013-06-27 22:03:42 <nsh> BW^-, see the InitializeConnectorSingletonFactory class
1796 2013-06-27 22:06:29 <michagogo> sipa: I had a thought.
1797 2013-06-27 22:06:47 <michagogo> I can try to build native for linux in the ubuntu vm
1798 2013-06-27 22:06:58 <michagogo> Then run bitcoind in there
1799 2013-06-27 22:07:11 <michagogo> And simply switch the networking to "host-only"
1800 2013-06-27 22:07:13 <BW^-> nsh: where would that be?
1801 2013-06-27 22:07:24 <BW^-> sipa: connector as in, the party that connected
1802 2013-06-27 22:07:24 <nsh> BW^-, was trolling, sorry. :)
1803 2013-06-27 22:07:32 <BW^-> aha note.d
1804 2013-06-27 22:07:35 * nsh smiles
1805 2013-06-27 22:07:50 <BW^-> nsh,*: is there any like "from the mechanistic point of view" BTC protocol spec anywhere?
1806 2013-06-27 22:07:57 <nsh> BW^-, have you read the network protocol page on the bitcoinwiki ?
1807 2013-06-27 22:08:12 <sipa> michagogo: sure
1808 2013-06-27 22:08:18 <nsh> BW^-, there is a dearth of nice write-ups giving examples of how things work. please write one
1809 2013-06-27 22:08:44 <michagogo> sipa: Am I correct that it should be
1810 2013-06-27 22:08:44 <michagogo> void RelayTransaction(const CTransaction& tx, const uint256& hash, const CDataStream& ss)\r\n{\r\n return;\r\n}
1811 2013-06-27 22:08:45 <michagogo> ?
1812 2013-06-27 22:08:50 BurtyB2 has joined
1813 2013-06-27 22:08:58 tg has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1814 2013-06-27 22:09:02 <michagogo> Or did I misunderstand you?
1815 2013-06-27 22:09:06 <sipa> yes, looks right
1816 2013-06-27 22:09:11 <nsh> ack
1817 2013-06-27 22:09:43 <michagogo> So, that will mean it'll accept transactions over the network and sendrawtransaction, and process them, put them into mempool, etc
1818 2013-06-27 22:09:49 <michagogo> but not pass them on?
1819 2013-06-27 22:10:55 <sipa> sounds right
1820 2013-06-27 22:11:55 <BW^-> nsh: the "Protocol specification" doc says what should be transmitted when in active mode, no?
1821 2013-06-27 22:12:26 <BW^-> nsh: there's nowhere anything like "This protocol goes straight into active mode, no handshake needed" - though I though I read about some Agent header on handshake somewhere, also BitcoinJ's source uses the word handshake
1822 2013-06-27 22:12:36 porquilho has quit ()
1823 2013-06-27 22:13:01 BurtyBB has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
1824 2013-06-27 22:13:06 <nsh> i am almost certainly close to the bottom in the #bitcoin-dev rankings of people to ask actual technical questions to :)
1825 2013-06-27 22:13:19 <Luke-Jr> BW^-: send the "ver" message first
1826 2013-06-27 22:13:26 <sipa> Luke-Jr: s/ver/version/
1827 2013-06-27 22:13:35 <Luke-Jr> oh, was it spelled out? >_<
1828 2013-06-27 22:13:41 <sipa> yes, version/verack
1829 2013-06-27 22:13:52 <sipa> consistency++
1830 2013-06-27 22:13:53 milone_ has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1831 2013-06-27 22:14:09 <Luke-Jr> XD
1832 2013-06-27 22:14:12 signor777 has joined
1833 2013-06-27 22:14:23 milone has joined
1834 2013-06-27 22:14:32 roconnor has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1835 2013-06-27 22:14:37 <BW^-> luke-jr: aha that's all?
1836 2013-06-27 22:14:39 <michagogo> Oh, and just to make sure -- `wget https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/archive/v0.8.3.zip && unzip v0.8.3.zip && cd bitcoin-0.8.3/src && gedit net.cpp && make -f makefile.unix`, correct?
1837 2013-06-27 22:15:05 <michagogo> (after getting the dependencies)
1838 2013-06-27 22:15:12 <sipa> yes
1839 2013-06-27 22:15:15 <michagogo> k
1840 2013-06-27 22:15:24 Guest83631 has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1841 2013-06-27 22:15:27 <sipa> BW^-: there is a version message, to which the peer replies with a verack
1842 2013-06-27 22:15:35 allex2501 has joined
1843 2013-06-27 22:15:36 <sipa> BW^-: after that the connection is initialized
1844 2013-06-27 22:15:45 <sipa> but i'm not familiar with the BitcoinJ API
1845 2013-06-27 22:15:46 <BW^-> sipa: aha, so the ver message is all, ok noted. thx.
1846 2013-06-27 22:15:52 <michagogo> I thought I saw something about "fatal: not a git repository or something: .git" scroll by... Is that a problem?
1847 2013-06-27 22:15:58 allex2501 is now known as Guest99846
1848 2013-06-27 22:16:00 <BW^-> sipa: indeed i was interested in the protocol not the particular implementaiton here, thx. :)
1849 2013-06-27 22:16:04 <nsh> fatal is gitspeak for "you can ignore this"
1850 2013-06-27 22:16:12 <sipa> lol
1851 2013-06-27 22:16:22 <sipa> michagogo: ignore that
1852 2013-06-27 22:16:25 A2501 has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
1853 2013-06-27 22:16:30 <michagogo> Does that mean that part of the build script tries to run a git command?
1854 2013-06-27 22:16:32 <sipa> that's the code for finding the version number
1855 2013-06-27 22:16:35 <BW^-> sipa: after this, does the other peer start complete broadcasting to you?
1856 2013-06-27 22:16:41 <sipa> michagogo: it has a fallback
1857 2013-06-27 22:16:48 <michagogo> Okay, thanks
1858 2013-06-27 22:16:50 <sipa> BW^-: if you want something you have to ask for it :)
1859 2013-06-27 22:17:00 <sipa> BW^-: but new transactions and blocks are announced
1860 2013-06-27 22:17:09 <sipa> after which you can choose to request them
1861 2013-06-27 22:17:46 * michagogo stares blankly at the wall of incomprehensible text
1862 2013-06-27 22:17:47 tg has joined
1863 2013-06-27 22:18:12 <BW^-> sipa: aha, so by the latter you mean there's broadcasts of *all* the new things
1864 2013-06-27 22:18:12 <BW^-> ok
1865 2013-06-27 22:18:22 <sipa> BW^-: indeed
1866 2013-06-27 22:18:28 <sipa> BW^-: it's a gossip protocol
1867 2013-06-27 22:18:31 <michagogo> Okay, I got a prompt back. Where does the output go?
1868 2013-06-27 22:18:36 <BW^-> sipa: so it's just, if you want to retrieve *old* stuff, you need to ask for it explicitly.
1869 2013-06-27 22:18:52 <sipa> BW^-: you can ask for old blocks, yes
1870 2013-06-27 22:18:58 <sipa> BW^-: you can't ask for old transactions
1871 2013-06-27 22:19:34 <sipa> new things are announced (by their hash in an 'inv' message), but not immediately sent
1872 2013-06-27 22:19:44 arthurb_ has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1873 2013-06-27 22:20:12 <BW^-> aha
1874 2013-06-27 22:20:21 <BW^-> sipa: zoomong out a bit -
1875 2013-06-27 22:20:28 <sipa> so that if you hear about something from 53 peers, you don't receive it 53 times
1876 2013-06-27 22:20:28 gritball has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
1877 2013-06-27 22:20:41 <BW^-> sipa: what's the logics for knowing what chain to work on?
1878 2013-06-27 22:20:43 milone_ has joined
1879 2013-06-27 22:20:46 <sipa> BW^-: pain
1880 2013-06-27 22:20:46 <BW^-> i mean, so there are no splits
1881 2013-06-27 22:20:49 <BW^-> hehe
1882 2013-06-27 22:21:02 <sipa> BW^-: the rule is: the longest valid chain you know
1883 2013-06-27 22:21:05 <BW^-> aha
1884 2013-06-27 22:21:13 <sipa> how you find out what that is: you can ask for it
1885 2013-06-27 22:21:20 <BW^-> sipa: so for every chain a BTCD node has, it should keep a counter of how many steps back it is to the first one..
1886 2013-06-27 22:21:29 imd23 has quit (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
1887 2013-06-27 22:21:34 <sipa> BW^-: 'length' is actually measured in amount of hashing work
1888 2013-06-27 22:21:36 <BW^-> sipa: ..and then maintain an index of steps back known per node?
1889 2013-06-27 22:21:42 <BW^-> right
1890 2013-06-27 22:21:45 <sipa> and there is indeed a counter kept for that for every block
1891 2013-06-27 22:21:50 <BW^-> super
1892 2013-06-27 22:22:03 <BW^-> sipa: where is the amount of hashing work registered in the protocol?
1893 2013-06-27 22:22:07 <sipa> it isn't
1894 2013-06-27 22:22:08 <phantomcircuit> the "right" way to do that is to have chain identifiers
1895 2013-06-27 22:22:09 <BW^-> *wrapping mind around*
1896 2013-06-27 22:22:12 <sipa> you compute it
1897 2013-06-27 22:22:12 <phantomcircuit> but that gets annoying fast
1898 2013-06-27 22:22:24 <BW^-> phantomcircuit: chain identifiers, as in what?
1899 2013-06-27 22:22:31 ThomasV has quit (Quit: Quitte)
1900 2013-06-27 22:22:44 <phantomcircuit> as in each block is tagged with chain numbers
1901 2013-06-27 22:22:59 <BW^-> phantomcircuit: like what kind of numbers?
1902 2013-06-27 22:23:00 <sipa> what in case of a fork?
1903 2013-06-27 22:23:06 <phantomcircuit> sipa, yeah
1904 2013-06-27 22:23:08 imd23 has joined
1905 2013-06-27 22:23:16 <sipa> BW^-: typically block hashes are used as identifiers
1906 2013-06-27 22:23:20 <phantomcircuit> it's the only way to correctly calculate correcting entries for a double entry accounting system
1907 2013-06-27 22:23:27 Guest70692 has quit (Quit: leaving)
1908 2013-06-27 22:23:27 <sipa> BW^-: but you can't know from a block hash where in the tree it's supposed to be
1909 2013-06-27 22:23:27 Liquid3xB has joined
1910 2013-06-27 22:23:40 <phantomcircuit> in the event that a transaction is double spent and then the double spent is double spent to the original
1911 2013-06-27 22:23:44 <sipa> phantomcircuit: meh, disagree, that's pure wallet implementation
1912 2013-06-27 22:23:47 <phantomcircuit> which is admittedly hilariously unlikely
1913 2013-06-27 22:24:04 petertodd has joined
1914 2013-06-27 22:24:17 <phantomcircuit> sipa, to deal with the above situation requires some sort of unique identifier per reorg
1915 2013-06-27 22:24:19 * sipa tests index-by-address blockindex patch
1916 2013-06-27 22:24:28 <sipa> phantomcircuit: disagree
1917 2013-06-27 22:24:33 milone has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1918 2013-06-27 22:24:36 <sipa> phantomcircuit: just have a log-based wallet
1919 2013-06-27 22:24:50 <sipa> when a block gets connected that credits you, write a +entry
1920 2013-06-27 22:25:00 <sipa> when such a block gets disconnected, write a -entry
1921 2013-06-27 22:25:12 <phantomcircuit> sipa, node/wallet are disjointed
1922 2013-06-27 22:25:19 <phantomcircuit> cant rely on the entries getting written
1923 2013-06-27 22:25:22 <sipa> so?
1924 2013-06-27 22:26:03 <sipa> the wallet somehow has to be informated about the chain
1925 2013-06-27 22:26:12 <sipa> whether it's separate or not
1926 2013-06-27 22:26:12 <gfawkes> luv the micropayment channel news!
1927 2013-06-27 22:26:39 <sipa> *informed
1928 2013-06-27 22:26:54 patcon has joined
1929 2013-06-27 22:26:59 <phantomcircuit> sipa, right, i guess you could create an event log on the node and have the wallet consume that
1930 2013-06-27 22:27:01 fewerlaws has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1931 2013-06-27 22:27:31 <phantomcircuit> you'd probably want to store the event log for a long time though
1932 2013-06-27 22:27:41 <phantomcircuit> which would be prohibitive pretty quickly i suspect
1933 2013-06-27 22:27:41 <sipa> that event log is called the block chain :p
1934 2013-06-27 22:28:18 <sipa> because for purely offline replay, you'll never observe a reorg
1935 2013-06-27 22:28:20 <phantomcircuit> sipa, not really as i said you can have two reorgs which result in a chain state that's ambiguous as to whether there was a reorg or not
1936 2013-06-27 22:28:40 <phantomcircuit> so lets say you have some web wallet
1937 2013-06-27 22:28:42 * nsh muses
1938 2013-06-27 22:28:42 <sipa> every wallet transaction knows the block it is part of
1939 2013-06-27 22:28:53 <sipa> if that block is no longer in the main chain, disconnect
1940 2013-06-27 22:28:58 <phantomcircuit> sipa, im not really explaining this correctly i think
1941 2013-06-27 22:29:00 <phantomcircuit> let me try again
1942 2013-06-27 22:29:24 <BW^-> are all connections TLS with NULL as cipher?
1943 2013-06-27 22:29:27 <BW^-> or raw/plaintext?
1944 2013-06-27 22:29:27 <phantomcircuit> synchronizing the wallet and the node as to the current best chain isn't hard
1945 2013-06-27 22:29:43 <sipa> first of all, what kind of wallet are you talking about
1946 2013-06-27 22:29:56 <sipa> what is stored in it, and where is it stored
1947 2013-06-27 22:30:01 <phantomcircuit> sipa, not the kind you are
1948 2013-06-27 22:30:02 FabianB_ has joined
1949 2013-06-27 22:30:09 <sipa> i'm not a wallet
1950 2013-06-27 22:30:11 <phantomcircuit> sipa, think web wallet
1951 2013-06-27 22:30:19 <sipa> that's not an answer :)
1952 2013-06-27 22:30:22 milone_ has quit (Quit: Leaving)
1953 2013-06-27 22:30:27 <BW^-> ?
1954 2013-06-27 22:30:41 <sipa> i asked what is stored in the wallet, and where it is stored
1955 2013-06-27 22:30:47 milone has joined
1956 2013-06-27 22:30:53 <sipa> you told me only how its interface is written
1957 2013-06-27 22:31:01 <phantomcircuit> sipa, watch only wallet which is only counting pubkeyhash transactions to specific addresses and crediting "accounts" on a web wallet service
1958 2013-06-27 22:31:04 FabianB has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
1959 2013-06-27 22:31:23 <sipa> and where are those accounts stored?
1960 2013-06-27 22:31:31 <phantomcircuit> sql db somewhere
1961 2013-06-27 22:31:41 <phantomcircuit> proper accounting requires that you issue a correcting entry in the event of a double spend
1962 2013-06-27 22:31:50 <sipa> absolutely
1963 2013-06-27 22:32:04 <phantomcircuit> now lets say there is a huge reorg
1964 2013-06-27 22:32:08 <phantomcircuit> and it's no longer double spent
1965 2013-06-27 22:32:09 <sipa> so, store for every account the best block it has seen
1966 2013-06-27 22:32:12 signor777 has quit (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
1967 2013-06-27 22:32:14 <nsh> phantomcircuit, so you're won over by these Generally Accepted Accounting Principles discussions? :P
1968 2013-06-27 22:32:28 <sipa> GAAP makes perfect sense at a wallet level
1969 2013-06-27 22:32:30 tg has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
1970 2013-06-27 22:32:31 <sipa> not at the blockchain level
1971 2013-06-27 22:32:35 * nsh nods
1972 2013-06-27 22:32:46 <phantomcircuit> sipa, right, there is a disconnect sort of
1973 2013-06-27 22:33:03 <phantomcircuit> the blockchain is always the current best journal
1974 2013-06-27 22:33:13 <sipa> i see a wallet as something that observes changes to the tip of the chain
1975 2013-06-27 22:33:43 <phantomcircuit> nsh, everything i've ever written has stringently adhered to GAAP
1976 2013-06-27 22:33:53 <phantomcircuit> unlike pretty much every other piece of bitcoin software
1977 2013-06-27 22:34:02 <nsh> phantomcircuit, noted :)
1978 2013-06-27 22:34:22 <BW^-> over the BTC node to node connection, is there any encoding wrapping the protocol - is it raw or SSL??
1979 2013-06-27 22:34:24 <BW^-> or either?
1980 2013-06-27 22:34:48 <sipa> BW^-: raw, custom, message based protocol
1981 2013-06-27 22:34:56 <sipa> no encryption or authentication whatsoever
1982 2013-06-27 22:35:23 <BW^-> sipa: aha, and no SSL ever?
1983 2013-06-27 22:35:29 <sipa> no
1984 2013-06-27 22:35:31 <BW^-> noted.
1985 2013-06-27 22:35:35 <sipa> there's nothing secret
1986 2013-06-27 22:35:38 <phantomcircuit> sipa, right that would end up being an event log
1987 2013-06-27 22:35:49 coingenuity has joined
1988 2013-06-27 22:36:08 <phantomcircuit> sipa, essentially the node (thing keeping track of the best chain) would need to generate a log of activity
1989 2013-06-27 22:36:20 <phantomcircuit> that shouldn't be very hard to do though
1990 2013-06-27 22:36:44 <phantomcircuit> there just needs to be a consistent path to the best chain
1991 2013-06-27 22:36:54 <phantomcircuit> normally this would just be adding 1 block at a time
1992 2013-06-27 22:37:31 Guest99846 is now known as A2501
1993 2013-06-27 22:37:49 * nsh frowns
1994 2013-06-27 22:38:10 <phantomcircuit> nsh, huh
1995 2013-06-27 22:38:34 <nsh> oh, no direct comment. i was trying to think of ways that stuff might happen in a globally nonconsistent way
1996 2013-06-27 22:38:46 <nsh> but my brain is not at best tonight and i don't know enough
1997 2013-06-27 22:39:13 <nsh> also i'm not really paying attention. i should probably just keep quiet :)
1998 2013-06-27 22:39:18 <phantomcircuit> nsh, the issue is that if you only have access to the current best chain the wallet has to have reorg logic
1999 2013-06-27 22:39:31 <nsh> right
2000 2013-06-27 22:39:32 <phantomcircuit> if it's just an event log that massively simplifies the endeavor
2001 2013-06-27 22:39:51 <phantomcircuit> the same thing can be achieved by having incrementing chain ids
2002 2013-06-27 22:39:56 <nsh> but my thought process started with considering that not all events are global?
2003 2013-06-27 22:40:13 <phantomcircuit> nsh, all blockchain events are global
2004 2013-06-27 22:40:21 <nsh> hmm, okay
2005 2013-06-27 22:40:22 <phantomcircuit> the real head scratcher comes if you want to get past activity
2006 2013-06-27 22:40:32 <nsh> there are divergent histories
2007 2013-06-27 22:40:33 <phantomcircuit> (hint point in time snapshot + log replay)
2008 2013-06-27 22:40:48 <phantomcircuit> nsh, it doesn't matter as long as they all end up at the same place
2009 2013-06-27 22:40:49 <nsh> that is, different ways that things could lead to the current state
2010 2013-06-27 22:40:52 <michagogo> Okay, I seem to have built my modified bitcoind and it's syncing, as far as I can tell
2011 2013-06-27 22:40:53 <nsh> ok
2012 2013-06-27 22:41:07 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
2013 2013-06-27 22:41:13 handle has joined
2014 2013-06-27 22:41:14 <michagogo> Does `sendtoaddress` return the txid?
2015 2013-06-27 22:41:14 <nsh> but the consensus is only designed to apply to the 'present'
2016 2013-06-27 22:41:22 <nsh> as given by the difficulty clockrate
2017 2013-06-27 22:41:28 <phantomcircuit> sipa, for an example of why this matters see coinbase negative account balances, that was caused by reprocessing the blockchain causing hilarity with correcting entries being weird
2018 2013-06-27 22:41:29 <nsh> is that a reasonable statement?
2019 2013-06-27 22:41:40 <phantomcircuit> michagogo, yes
2020 2013-06-27 22:41:48 <michagogo> Thanks.
2021 2013-06-27 22:41:50 <phantomcircuit> nsh, yeah it is
2022 2013-06-27 22:42:00 <nsh> ok
2023 2013-06-27 22:42:05 <phantomcircuit> nsh, any version of reorg history that results in the current best chain is ok though
2024 2013-06-27 22:42:09 handle_ has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
2025 2013-06-27 22:42:20 <michagogo> Odd, how come `getdifficulty` is returning 1.00000000?
2026 2013-06-27 22:42:21 sensorii has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2027 2013-06-27 22:42:25 <nsh> phantomcircuit, certain accounts may require more processing though
2028 2013-06-27 22:42:36 <phantomcircuit> michagogo, testnet?
2029 2013-06-27 22:42:38 <nsh> i can't immediately see why this could be a problem, but just musing
2030 2013-06-27 22:42:38 <michagogo> Yeah
2031 2013-06-27 22:42:45 <michagogo> It was 240.something a bit ago
2032 2013-06-27 22:42:50 <nsh> (accounts of history)
2033 2013-06-27 22:43:40 sensorii has joined
2034 2013-06-27 22:45:26 <phantomcircuit> michagogo, if there isn't a block after x time it goes back to 1
2035 2013-06-27 22:45:29 tg has joined
2036 2013-06-27 22:45:29 <phantomcircuit> i forget what x is
2037 2013-06-27 22:45:51 free499__ has joined
2038 2013-06-27 22:46:09 testnode9_ has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2039 2013-06-27 22:46:15 <michagogo> Last block was 15 minutes ago
2040 2013-06-27 22:46:25 <michagogo> But it was 1 at least 5 or so mins ago
2041 2013-06-27 22:46:42 <michagogo> Also, if it reset to 1 how come blocks aren't flooding in now>
2042 2013-06-27 22:46:44 <michagogo> now?*
2043 2013-06-27 22:46:52 patcon has joined
2044 2013-06-27 22:47:04 jgarzik has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2045 2013-06-27 22:47:15 da2ce7 has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
2046 2013-06-27 22:47:45 jgarzik has joined
2047 2013-06-27 22:48:07 BW^- has quit (Quit: Miranda IM! Smaller, Faster, Easier. http://miranda-im.org)
2048 2013-06-27 22:48:09 jgarzik is now known as Guest97364
2049 2013-06-27 22:48:23 TheLordOfTime has quit (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2050 2013-06-27 22:50:00 MC1984_ has quit (Read error: Operation timed out)
2051 2013-06-27 22:50:31 Vinnie_win has joined
2052 2013-06-27 22:50:36 MC1984_ has joined
2053 2013-06-27 22:51:37 TheLordOfTime has joined
2054 2013-06-27 22:51:41 KillYourTV has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2055 2013-06-27 22:52:24 dan_ has quit (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
2056 2013-06-27 22:52:30 wamatt has joined
2057 2013-06-27 22:52:56 dan_ has joined
2058 2013-06-27 22:54:45 HaltingState has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2059 2013-06-27 22:55:35 KillYourTV has joined
2060 2013-06-27 22:56:45 viperhr has joined
2061 2013-06-27 22:56:46 <michagogo> Hmm, it appears that bfgminer doesn't recognize the testnet's difficulty resets
2062 2013-06-27 22:57:28 andyh2 has quit (Quit: Linkinus - http://linkinus.com)
2063 2013-06-27 22:58:34 wei_ has joined
2064 2013-06-27 23:00:03 testnode9_ has joined
2065 2013-06-27 23:00:59 <michagogo> What does the "target" object in the output of getblocktemplate mean? (not what is it, what does it mean)
2066 2013-06-27 23:01:41 <sipa> it's the target hash
2067 2013-06-27 23:01:46 <sipa> the value you have to be lower
2068 2013-06-27 23:02:01 free499__ has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2069 2013-06-27 23:02:39 <michagogo> What would a value of 0000000001108300000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 translate to in terms of difficulty?
2070 2013-06-27 23:03:21 <nsh> solve N = 2^32 * d
2071 2013-06-27 23:03:50 <michagogo> Hmm, getdifficulty is returning 240.48507088 again now
2072 2013-06-27 23:04:02 <michagogo> It was returning 1.00000000 a couple minutes ago...
2073 2013-06-27 23:05:02 * michagogo is confused
2074 2013-06-27 23:05:39 milone_ has joined
2075 2013-06-27 23:05:44 <sipa> it jumps to 1 if there hasn't been a block for 20 minutes
2076 2013-06-27 23:06:38 <sipa> 240.48507088284620787523
2077 2013-06-27 23:06:39 gfinn has joined
2078 2013-06-27 23:07:28 <michagogo> sipa: And there was a 20 minute gap between blocks
2079 2013-06-27 23:07:52 <michagogo> However, the difficulty was returning as 1 about 10 minutes after block 93693
2080 2013-06-27 23:08:55 <sipa> maybe it returns the difficulty of the last block, rather than the difficulty of the next?
2081 2013-06-27 23:09:24 HaltingState has joined
2082 2013-06-27 23:09:24 HaltingState has quit (Changing host)
2083 2013-06-27 23:09:24 HaltingState has joined
2084 2013-06-27 23:09:28 milone has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2085 2013-06-27 23:11:20 toffoo has joined
2086 2013-06-27 23:11:30 impulse has quit (Quit: leaving)
2087 2013-06-27 23:14:34 avarab is now known as avar
2088 2013-06-27 23:14:58 davout has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
2089 2013-06-27 23:21:49 agnostic98 has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
2090 2013-06-27 23:24:30 one_zero has joined
2091 2013-06-27 23:25:49 agnostic98 has joined
2092 2013-06-27 23:32:06 KillYourTV has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
2093 2013-06-27 23:32:48 MobiusL has quit (Excess Flood)
2094 2013-06-27 23:33:52 MobiusL has joined
2095 2013-06-27 23:34:06 KillYourTV has joined
2096 2013-06-27 23:34:47 milone_ has quit (Quit: Leaving)
2097 2013-06-27 23:35:12 milone has joined
2098 2013-06-27 23:35:58 justusranvier has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2099 2013-06-27 23:36:05 <sipa> realazthat: hi!
2100 2013-06-27 23:36:21 reneg has joined
2101 2013-06-27 23:36:24 reneg has quit (Max SendQ exceeded)
2102 2013-06-27 23:39:00 handle_ has joined
2103 2013-06-27 23:39:21 Guest83277 has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2104 2013-06-27 23:40:12 MoALTz_ has joined
2105 2013-06-27 23:40:50 patcon has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
2106 2013-06-27 23:41:21 handle has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2107 2013-06-27 23:42:08 patcon has joined
2108 2013-06-27 23:42:21 reneg has joined
2109 2013-06-27 23:42:43 justusranvier has joined
2110 2013-06-27 23:42:44 reneg is now known as Guest28769
2111 2013-06-27 23:42:45 MoALTz has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds)
2112 2013-06-27 23:44:10 filleokus has quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
2113 2013-06-27 23:44:57 <dan_> How many signatories on a multi-sig address are widely supported by the network?
2114 2013-06-27 23:45:34 <michagogo> getblocktemplate is still returning the same target, but getdifficulty is returning 1
2115 2013-06-27 23:45:37 <sipa> N-of-M, with M up to 3
2116 2013-06-27 23:45:48 <sipa> the protocol supports M up to 20
2117 2013-06-27 23:45:54 * michagogo is confused
2118 2013-06-27 23:46:00 <dan_> Is there any talk of increasing that M?
2119 2013-06-27 23:46:07 <dan_> Is it a tx size limit?
2120 2013-06-27 23:46:09 <sipa> no
2121 2013-06-27 23:46:14 <phantomcircuit> dan_, the limit is an IsStandard check iirc
2122 2013-06-27 23:46:27 <dan_> ah ok, thanks
2123 2013-06-27 23:46:31 <phantomcircuit> i believe it's the OP_CHECKMULTISIG
2124 2013-06-27 23:46:42 <sipa> OP_CHECKMULTISIG allows up 20 pubkeys
2125 2013-06-27 23:46:50 <sipa> IsStandard() up to 3
2126 2013-06-27 23:46:53 filleokus has joined
2127 2013-06-27 23:47:15 <nsh> what might go horribly black death if that was raised to 5 or 10 or something?
2128 2013-06-27 23:47:24 <sipa> most likely nothing
2129 2013-06-27 23:47:38 * nsh nods
2130 2013-06-27 23:47:38 <sipa> but it needs to be tested, ... first
2131 2013-06-27 23:47:41 Lolcust has quit (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
2132 2013-06-27 23:47:43 <nsh> right
2133 2013-06-27 23:48:12 <dan_> it would be nice, to be able to have a bigger group collectively spend funds. that's one problem i'm running into with it
2134 2013-06-27 23:49:00 <dan_> this would be horrible, but could they be chained? multi-sig addr out of 3 multi-sig addrs?
2135 2013-06-27 23:49:21 <sipa> no
2136 2013-06-27 23:49:33 <sipa> OP_CHECKMULTISIG needs pubkeys as input
2137 2013-06-27 23:49:41 <sipa> it can't take new scripts
2138 2013-06-27 23:49:53 <dan_> gotcha, thanks for the info
2139 2013-06-27 23:50:48 BurtyB2 has left ()
2140 2013-06-27 23:54:03 Lolcust has joined